D800E owners?

Soldato
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Posts
3,698
Location
London
Hola,

Thinking about moving from Large format 5x4 to a D800E in the next few months before I do a big USA trip,

I was thinking of a MF digital, like a Pentax 645D or a second hand Phase-one, but if the D800E is coupled with a Distagon or other high quality prime, the difference in quality is going to be so close - it makes no sense to spend an extra £2-3k....

Any D800E owners in here? any experiences?
 
The Sigma 35mm is far sharper than any Zeiss in the range. Similarly the Nikon 14-24 wipes the floor with Zeiss, Contax and Leica primes at the wide end (not at 24 though).

Hmmm I was already looking at possibly getting the 14-24 for the D800E, it seems like a pretty sweet lens,

But from that Ksanti is saying, that 645z looks amazing.. but I bet it comes with an amazing price-tag.. (I probably have no more than £6k to spend) with that I can get a D800E and a few lenses, but only a 645D and one lens..

I won't be getting anything until July, so hopefully I'll have a chance to see how the 645Z is received, and it's price..


One question I have - sharpness is one thing, but what about things like lens distortion? my large format lenses are absolutely free from things like distortion, I remember shooting my Canon 1D a few years ago and things being all over the place, (think it was a 17-40) if I went with the 14-24, would the image be nice and straight corner to corner?
 
ffs

UK pricing released for the 645Z, $8400 in the US but it's £6700 here ($11k) might just pick one up in america, screw paying UK prices, wouldn't mind having it for a bit beforehand mind.. ;_;
 
Printing A2 max (I have my own workflow and an Epson 3880)

Yeah, unless the price drops by July - the 645Z is gonna be out of my price range plain and simple.

Looking at the D800E, I could get one, a 14-24 and a 70-200 (I like telephoto landscapes) and still be way within budget, if I went with a standard 645D I'd only be able to afford one lens... and probably not really tell the difference?

DECISIONS DECISIONS...
 
lol

I just looked at some sample shots of the Sigma DP2 and they're awful, looks like a watercolour painting, the resolution in terms of image size is obviously there - but the images themselves look like decent phone camera quality to me.

I'll hold out for a few months and see where I end up, the one thing that's bugging me is the aspect ratio of MF - is similar to what I'm already shooting (5x4) which isn't as wide as 35mm, I prefer the squarer format..
 
I'm not convinced at all, especially reading people who are complaining that it isn't very good in low light situations, or where a wide exposure latitude is required - which is pretty much 100% the conditions I operate in,

I dare say in some situations, you'd struggle to tell the difference between a D800 and pretty much *any* point and shoot, but I'd argue that in difficult conditions with especially challenging light (especially landscapes) It'd be left wanting,
 
At A2 print sizes you would never tell the difference between a D800 and MFD.

Yeah, I think my mind is made tbh... going MFD just doesn't seem to make sense, considering I could also get back to doing wildlife with a D800E,
 
Back
Top Bottom