Dali Kupid+AV receiver, am I wrong?

Soldato
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Posts
3,239
Location
Queens Park - London
Hi all

I need some advice, I'm looking to setup a 2.0 speaker setup for my TV using a used AV receiver & amp combo with a pair of Dali Kupid speakers.

I'm not interested in anything more than 2.0 audio, a subwoofer would disturb my housemate and 5.1 or 7.1 surround sound isn't my jam at the moment.

The reason for the AV receiver is that they are cheap on the used market and is the more sensible part of this idea, the less sensible part of this idea is the use of the Kupid speakers given that they aren't really ideal for a TV audio setup when there are a ton of home entertainment specific speakers out there.

The Kupid's have a lack of bass and are designed for smaller rooms which is great for what I want - I just want clean and crisp audio that won't rattle the house to pieces.

The Kupid has the following specs:
  • 4ohms
  • 83 dB @ 1 m for 2.83 V
  • 40W to 120W
  • 63 – 25,000 Hz ±3 dB
The TV room is probably 4m by 4m.

Is there any one out there who can assist and let me know if I'm barking up the wrong tree, please?
 
Last edited:
No I don't think you are, Choice of audio hardware is subjective & a lottery in my opinion. One persons 'nirvana' (a term audio reviewers used in the 80's) is another persons sonic hell. if you don't like the sound it churns out, sell it on. I'm happy with the 2 channel sound of my denon AVR, but then i've owned it for 10 years and got used to the sound. I don't plan on changing it anytime soon unless it goes bang.
 
No I don't think you are, Choice of audio hardware is subjective & a lottery in my opinion. One persons 'nirvana' (a term audio reviewers used in the 80's) is another persons sonic hell. if you don't like the sound it churns out, sell it on. I'm happy with the 2 channel sound of my denon AVR, but then i've owned it for 10 years and got used to the sound. I don't plan on changing it anytime soon unless it goes bang.
Thanks for the reply. I’m happy to stick with a 2.0 system until I can buy my own place and then upgrade to a 2.1 then.

I think I’m slightly concerned about the 4 ohm rating of the Kupid as potentially limiting my choices of AV receiver.

I can get my hands on some free 6 ohm rated surround sound speakers now and look for an AV receiver that can do 4,6 and 8 ohms for flexibility.
 
Hi all

I need some advice, I'm looking to setup a 2.0 speaker setup for my TV using a used AV receiver & amp combo with a pair of Dali Kupid speakers.

I'm not interested in anything more than 2.0 audio, a subwoofer would disturb my housemate and 5.1 or 7.1 surround sound isn't my jam at the moment.

The reason for the AV receiver is that they are cheap on the used market and is the more sensible part of this idea, the less sensible part of this idea is the use of the Kupid speakers given that they aren't really ideal for a TV audio setup when there are a ton of home entertainment specific speakers out there.

The Kupid's have a lack of bass and are designed for smaller rooms which is great for what I want - I just want clean and crisp audio that won't rattle the house to pieces.

The Kupid has the following specs:
  • 4ohms
  • 83 dB @ 1 m for 2.83 V
  • 40W to 120W
  • 63 – 25,000 Hz ±3 dB
The TV room is probably 4m by 4m.

Is there any one out there who can assist and let me know if I'm barking up the wrong tree, please?

Those are incredibly hard to drive and inefficient, yeesh they're the lowest I've seen for a while. I have Q Acoustic 3010i, they're easier load and easier to drive. Similar in size as well.


Really do need a subwoofer, something like 8" will done, just to divert low bass from the bookshelf to a speaker that can reproduce those frequencies. I'd never set my 3010i as large (what happens when you set sub to off) for movies, too high risk of damage to the woofers.

I'd look for easier to drive more efficient speakers.
 
As for 2.0/2.1/5.1 or more

If you plan on using a TV, DVD, BD, or Kodi box to play TV Shows/Movies (for DTS/Dolby/Atmos/DTS:X) then use a AVR, even if you are using a stereo system. I've found multi channel mix, downmixed on a AVR better sounding that just using a PCM output. Also you won't lose the .1 LFE channel. Plus you'll have HDMI routing, where you need lots of I/O, onscreen display. They also have room correction, bass management, streaming features.

Some stereo gear have enough ie HDMI ARC input, bass management, room correction and streaming but they won't offer surround sound/downmixing.


If you want to route 4K through the AVR you'll need a HDMI 2.1 capable AVR. Or another method is route video from source 4K to TV then use ARC or E-ARC or second output on a BD player ie Panasonic 820 for audio only into the AVR.

Check your TV can output all audio formats, if it lacks DTS support than DTS stereo, 5.1, DTS HD Master, DTS:X won't work at all.
 
Do you ever intend on building beyond a 2.0/2.1 system?

If not an AVR is a hefty and needless expense, you can get 2.1 supporting HDMI AMP's for less than £100, such as the SMSL A50 Pro.
 
Do you ever intend on building beyond a 2.0/2.1 system?

If not an AVR is a hefty and needless expense, you can get 2.1 supporting HDMI AMP's for less than £100, such as the SMSL A50 Pro.

yeah seems ok however does that have

Bass management
Speaker time alignment
Room EQ, with some options like Denon room EQ app customisation (ie mid range compensation cut off)
OSD/setup
HDMI inputs/outputs
E-ARC input
Multi channel decoding - downmixing
.1 LFE channel restoration (not discarded)
Lip sync adjustment
 
yeah seems ok however does that have

Bass management
Speaker time alignment
Room EQ, with some options like Denon room EQ app customisation (ie mid range compensation cut off)
OSD/setup
HDMI inputs/outputs
E-ARC input
Multi channel decoding - downmixing
.1 LFE channel restoration (not discarded)
Lip sync adjustment

It doesn't need all of that for a basic 2.0 or 2.1 set up, do you think (assuming buying new) that a £400 + entry level AVR is worth the added cost and footprint?

Absolutely not in my mind.
 
It doesn't need all of that for a basic 2.0 or 2.1 set up, do you think (assuming buying new) that a £400 + entry level AVR is worth the added cost and footprint?

Absolutely not in my mind.

Long term I think it is. Sure a cheap T/D amp will get him up and running, I've tried one at £50 and they're pretty good...but very limited.

2.0/2.1 Hifi is not the same as 2.0/2.1 for a AV system. Look at the wiim forums, people with Wiim Amp still complaining that surround decoding/mixing and LFE isn't decoded. And as I said, I compared what the PCM and DD/DTS track decoding downmixing to stereo /2.1, and latter is better. a lot more dynamic range for one, subwoofer channel tons better.

Also don't need to spend £400 on a AVR, possible a 1080p model may be ok, route devices to TV, using ARC/E-ARC.
 
Do you ever intend on building beyond a 2.0/2.1 system?

If not an AVR is a hefty and needless expense, you can get 2.1 supporting HDMI AMP's for less than £100, such as the SMSL A50 Pro.
Probably not beyond 2.1 so that’s a solid shout, thanks.

An AVR is a cheap and effective way of getting my tv connected go a speaker setup.

I have an Audio pro C10 which I tried to connect via TOSLINK and a DAC but the audio kept getting out of sync.

I’ll checkout the A50 Pro and related today.
 
Probably not beyond 2.1 so that’s a solid shout, thanks.

An AVR is a cheap and effective way of getting my tv connected go a speaker setup.

I have an Audio pro C10 which I tried to connect via TOSLINK and a DAC but the audio kept getting out of sync.

I’ll checkout the A50 Pro and related today.

Yeah you need lip sync. Modern gear have auto lip sync now I never need to adjust it. AV pre is hdmi 2.0 TV is 2.1 BD unsure Panasonic 820

But on my older gear I needed to set per source/per input delay.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom