Associate
- Joined
- 21 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 77
I am having trouble deciding. I just wanted to ask you guys to see which one you would go for.
You'll get a lot more screen space, but it'll make text etc absolutely tiny. Shame they don't do a 1680x1050 panel because that'd be a nice in-between. I'd personally probably opt for the 1440x900, which then means you can pile on the AA and AF at native resolution in games and still have a very smooth experience.
Nothing but bad press from where? If you just look around on the Windows forum here, you'll see plenty of positive talk about Vista. It's a very solid OS, very nice to use, and certainly far better-suited to a brand-new gaming machine than XP is (for DX10 alone). The Vista website will show you what extras Ultimate has, but I personally don't think they're worth the extra money.
As for the rest, the CPU upgrade seems like it would be pointless, as would the TurboCache thing, considering you've got 4GB of RAM there already.
Very nice machine you'll have there though, should be blisteringly quick.
Been thinking about that Intel TurboMemory card thing again, and actually sat and did a bit of reading on it. Seems like a good idea and that it could potentially net a bit of extra battery life and speed up Hibernation/start-up, but there's just not much practical data on it. Struggled to find more than a couple of reviews, and they were quite old so it's likely they've improved support since then.
For £15, I'd be tempted...but then again, I'm not sure. One review indicated a loss of performance in some cases, whereas other people have stated dramatic improvements in game loading times etc.
I suppose if you're spending that much money on the machine in the first place, £15 isn't very much!