Hi all,
Just looking for people’s opinions on the following scenario.
Dentist tells patient they need a tooth extraction but will first need a round of antibiotics due to infection. Dentist re-books patient in for a tooth extraction in 8 days after the course of antibiotics has finished.
However, the dentist cancels this appointment and re-books for 6 weeks later.
A week before the next appointment, the patient begins to suffer pain again due to the tooth getting infected again, meaning when the patient turns up to the rearranged appointment, they have to be prescribed antibiotics another time and again they get re-booked for an appointment 8 days later.
I’m asking because this is the situation my wife finds herself in. Due to the dentist cancelling the follow on appointment and only offering an appointment for 6 weeks later, her tooth has got infected again, meaning she needs another round of antibiotics, which isn’t ideal as she’s currently breastfeeding, she’s also had to go through more pain.
Maybe I’m expecting too much, but surely, if the dentist prescribes antibiotics in such a scenario, it’s unacceptable to then make the patient wait over 6 weeks to cure the problem because it could get infected again like my wife's has?
I use to be with the same dentist but had to find another one because after 2 weeks of phoning every day they still couldn't get me a pain appointment.
Just looking for people’s opinions on the following scenario.
Dentist tells patient they need a tooth extraction but will first need a round of antibiotics due to infection. Dentist re-books patient in for a tooth extraction in 8 days after the course of antibiotics has finished.
However, the dentist cancels this appointment and re-books for 6 weeks later.
A week before the next appointment, the patient begins to suffer pain again due to the tooth getting infected again, meaning when the patient turns up to the rearranged appointment, they have to be prescribed antibiotics another time and again they get re-booked for an appointment 8 days later.
I’m asking because this is the situation my wife finds herself in. Due to the dentist cancelling the follow on appointment and only offering an appointment for 6 weeks later, her tooth has got infected again, meaning she needs another round of antibiotics, which isn’t ideal as she’s currently breastfeeding, she’s also had to go through more pain.
Maybe I’m expecting too much, but surely, if the dentist prescribes antibiotics in such a scenario, it’s unacceptable to then make the patient wait over 6 weeks to cure the problem because it could get infected again like my wife's has?
I use to be with the same dentist but had to find another one because after 2 weeks of phoning every day they still couldn't get me a pain appointment.
