If an otherwise healthy dog had to have 2 of its legs removed (for reasons which were never established during the drunken pub conversation where this topic was mooted), which 2 legs should it be left with to give it the best quality of life?
In peoples opinion should it keep:
1. Both front legs
2. Both back legs
3. Both legs on one side
4. One front leg and one back leg on opposite sides
(No prosthetic limbs or mechanical aids are available, the dog just has to get by with its 2 legs.)
My choice was for 1. although I could understand the reasons why some people chose 2. what really suprised me was that several people chose 4.
No animals were harmed during the production of this post
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			In peoples opinion should it keep:
1. Both front legs
2. Both back legs
3. Both legs on one side
4. One front leg and one back leg on opposite sides
(No prosthetic limbs or mechanical aids are available, the dog just has to get by with its 2 legs.)
My choice was for 1. although I could understand the reasons why some people chose 2. what really suprised me was that several people chose 4.
No animals were harmed during the production of this post
	
 
	
	
	