Designcut 2007.

Permabanned
Joined
21 Apr 2004
Posts
13,312
Location
Wolverhampton
designcut2007rk9.jpg


A new year—a new design.

This is the proposed design for my website in the coming year. Not a million miles away from the current site, yet with a cleaner and more open feel.

However, I would like your opinions and thoughts on two things.

1. What do you think about the design? Colours/style/structure etc

2. I'm hoping to have a mini design community nested inside, however I'm aware that a large amount of people in this forum enjoy website design and other elements of the creative world, I was wondering if something like that is appealing?

Thanks.
 
I like it, apart from the navigation on the left. Im not keen on the right alignment or the all lowercase headings. I'd personally use a slightly more traditional menu.

Apart from that its pretty decent.
 
Actually just having viewed the current site, I would use the menu off that or at least something like that.
 
Looks pretty sexy to me. Not very different from the current one though, which is a shame.
 
No I disagree, great design. Menu is perfect. Much prefer it to the current one, which is cliche and boring tbh. Very nice.

Couldn't resist the slanty lines though (so last year).

What do you mean, mini design community? People submit designs?
 
joeyjojo said:
What do you mean, mini design community? People submit designs?

Basically a forum consisting of members revolving around the creative design world. Just putting the feelers out to see who would be interested in that, unless they are already members of one. I know of DesignersTalk but it's gone down hill recently. :)
 
While it looks great, as your current one does, I feel maybe instead of the design you need to focus on content more? The site at them moment looks fantastic, but everytime i click on your sig to have a wee look, i notice it hasnt been updated?
 
A question regarding your picture/pullquote section on the right-hand side: What's going to be there on the majority of pages? The design looks all lovely and nice with that particular content, but in practice you're not going to be always get white-backed portrait images to use alongside long articles. What sort of articles are you going to be writing i.e. are they the sort that will need images? My concern is that without anything in the right-hand bar, it's all going to look a little flat.

I do think the text content needs much stronger contrast and better styling/typography - for example, the line-height feels too tight and the 'pull-paragraph' is a bit plain in just bold text. At current, the part of the design that has the least visibility is the content itself; I'm drawn more to look at the surrounding area than the actual text. Better the other way round.

Regarding the design community, it all depends if it offers anything more than larger, established communities. I think it would be better to generate a community/readership from your blog and articles, and then create the forum if the need is there. If people are coming back, and the content of the site is something that is generating discussion and interest, then a forum could well be a viable addition. Otherwise I can't see it being any more of a success than the million-and-one other internet forums with a couple of posts added every few weeks.

On the other hand, if DesignersTalk is leaking members, then it sounds like you've got a good chance to make a successful splinter forum from an already established community ;).
 
Augmented said:
A question regarding your picture/pullquote section on the right-hand side: What's going to be there on the majority of pages? The design looks all lovely and nice with that particular content, but in practice you're not going to be always get white-backed portrait images to use alongside long articles. What sort of articles are you going to be writing i.e. are they the sort that will need images? My concern is that without anything in the right-hand bar, it's all going to look a little flat.

The image would be an integral part of the design, yes. However I have a massive image database that I can pull high quality images from, surrounding almost any subject. Bespoke images like the band one there are 99.9% of the time available, so it's unlikely that for each article/section I won't be able to find at least one image suitable for it.

Augmented said:
I do think the text content needs much stronger contrast and better styling/typography - for example, the line-height feels too tight and the 'pull-paragraph' is a bit plain in just bold text. At current, the part of the design that has the least visibility is the content itself; I'm drawn more to look at the surrounding area than the actual text. Better the other way round.

Noted. Now I look at it, you're right, the light height is too compact and the main text is probably a few shades too light.

The pull paragraph probably needs to be in colour too.

Augmented said:
Regarding the design community, it all depends if it offers anything more than larger, established communities. I think it would be better to generate a community/readership from your blog and articles, and then create the forum if the need is there. If people are coming back, and the content of the site is something that is generating discussion and interest, then a forum could well be a viable addition. Otherwise I can't see it being any more of a success than the million-and-one other internet forums with a couple of posts added every few weeks.

On the other hand, if DesignersTalk is leaking members, then it sounds like you've got a good chance to make a successful splinter forum from an already established community ;).

Yeah I guess it depends on how popular this site becomes, and I'll go from there. For now I'll drop the forum and simply monitor how much the site gets read daily. Cheers for the comments, much appreciated. :)
 
Looks really good m8, you and a few others on this forum make really good designs that are inspiration for my own web design tendencies.
 
I agree with Augmented on a number of issues — the line-height for the block text is too small, and even though the colour of the text and subsequent lack of contrast against the background is a problem, I'm also squinting to read the text. Provided the screenshot is actual size (catering for 800x600), I think you might want to increase the font size as well.

I also carry Augmented's concerns about the picture section on the right-hand side of the design. I think you're placing too much of an emphasis on the image as part of the overall design by having it so large and in such a prominent position on the page. As Augmented mentioned, finding images which are going to fit into the overall design could prove difficult, and stock images are a cliché I tend to consider the reserve of cheesy '90s corporate websites and cookie-cutter TemplateMonster templates. Whilst I don't know what kind of content you will be featuring on the site, I don't think stock images would add any value to the content. Especially not when their implementation into your current design would result in the loss of a vast amount of space below the image, in an already rather narrow design.

Perhaps the space on the right-hand side could be better utilised by information with more value contextually to the main text — important links and contact details which are currently relegated to the bottom of the page, a brief introduction to the subject matter or explanation of some terms used within the article, or even links to similar articles the reader might be interested in. Perhaps a small box enticing people to join the community, or even some carefully styled textual adverts if you are that way inclined. Anything to make better use of the vertical space, and especially the prominent position above the fold at lower resolutions such as 800x600 and 1024x768.

In fact, although I don't profess to be a connoisseur of fine graphical design and user interface considerations, I don't feel the design 'flowing' as well as it could. Whilst I commend you for thinking slightly more 'out of the box' (no pun intended) for emphasising the main content area and removing other elements such as the navigation and header from this, I get the impression that these elements are littered around the edges of the main content area as a bit of an afterthought. Both the navigation and header are positioned closely to the main content — which could in itself look strange in a design built for 800x600 viewing when viewed on a higher resolution screen — yet they don't interact much with this. Why not employ a bit more padding in the main content area and have either of these elements overlapping; the 'g' in 'designcut' edging over the harsh white background, or the current navigation item spreading across like a bookmark. If it was your intention to emphasise the main content over these elements, why not add a bit of depth by bordering the main content with a shadow effect or something similar? At the moment the design feels very linear, inbetween the limited colour palette, sharp edges and clearly defined elements, and whilst this may be excellent as a bold design statement, I still think it could do with a bit of softening up.

I fear I'm running out of educated assessments now and resorting to nit-picking, but I thought I'd give the old bugbear that is accessability a mention. The navigation on the left is rather clear in its functioning, I would say, and assuming the logo at the top of the page links back to the homepage, thats another accessibility point right there. However, semantically speaking one does wonder about the emphasis you have placed on individual elements. Whilst you are far from the only web designer to do this particular thing, and this is something I have only just considered, why is the logo at the top of the page larger than, say, the title of the article? Surely the name of the website is just a formality to the end user, and whilst its generally accepted as a prerequisite for any website, shouldn't the actual content take precedence? Perhaps you should operate a system whereby the website logo forms a relative focal point on the homepage, but is reduced in size and lurks in the shadows on content pages? As Augmented has already mentioned, the pullquote should command more attention than a simple bold typeface, and whilst this is not necessarily a design feature, you might want to consider splitting your content up under easily-recognisible sub-headings to further ease the reading process, with the customary 'go back to the top' links along the way.

Overall, not a bad effort at all. It definitely has potential, I'll give you that :)

Edit: Wow, did I really type that much? I need to get a life!

*av
 
Back
Top Bottom