Web browsing and word processing might be slightly annoying on a 19" WS as you lose a lot of height (from a 17"), although a 20" ws would be a lot better.
When I was buying I never considered a 19" WS because its too restrictive for general use (with the native res) imo. 20" is a different matter tho, I quite like it. Strikes a nice balance for both gaming and general/apps usage.
If I was forced to get a 19" tft it would have been either 5:4 or a 4:3 aspect.
You realy don't, and I think it's actualy better for general web browsing than my standard 17" was, and gaming is brilliant.
Im running the Hanns HW191D, there is a huge thread on here about it, should read up.
Every Dell I've used in the past 5 years can. I used to run the 1905FP at my workstation in portrait when doing lots of text work because it more closely resembled a piece of paper.
Sorry if this sounds harsh, but isn't this widescreen or not subject beaten to death many times? Somehow it tends to get monotonously re-beaten again and again and again Gimpymoo, my advice is 20" WS instead.
Gotta agree about 20" WS rather than 19". Then you get the same vertical resolution (slightly more actually) as a 17" or 19" 5:4 screen. You can get 20" WS for around £215 btw, like the LG L204WT.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.