I built a watercooled PC a month ago, expecting really nice over-clocking potential. However it seems to have been a waste of money as people on air seem to be having a better time than me. I know components vary in overclockability so did I just get really unlucky?
I have a 4770k that requires over 1.31v to get 4.5Ghz. I can do 4.4Ghz on 1.265v so I have it at that for now, but I've seen most people are getting 4.6Ghz+ while still under 1.3v.
My R9 290X is limited to 1150 core with +100mv, and there's no way to increase voltage more than that without flashing (which I might do, just scared of breaking something). I've seen people get that with the stock cooler, and without having to increase voltage at all.
Granted, my rig is fairly silent (bar the 290X coil whine which sounds worse than fans IMO). Can't help but feel slightly disappointed when I could have spent the ~£500 I spent on a custom loop, on two GTX 780s.
I have a 4770k that requires over 1.31v to get 4.5Ghz. I can do 4.4Ghz on 1.265v so I have it at that for now, but I've seen most people are getting 4.6Ghz+ while still under 1.3v.
My R9 290X is limited to 1150 core with +100mv, and there's no way to increase voltage more than that without flashing (which I might do, just scared of breaking something). I've seen people get that with the stock cooler, and without having to increase voltage at all.
Granted, my rig is fairly silent (bar the 290X coil whine which sounds worse than fans IMO). Can't help but feel slightly disappointed when I could have spent the ~£500 I spent on a custom loop, on two GTX 780s.