Differences between an LTD and Corporation

Well from my GCSE in business studies a company with LTD/Limited liability means that if the company fails and runs into debt then the owner only has to pay back as much as he or she invested in the company. Where as an Unlimited Company or PLC has unlimited liability which means that if they run into debt then they have to pay it all back even if it means selling their house and family etc. A PLC can also sell shares.
 
naffa said:
Well from my GCSE in business studies a company with LTD/Limited liability means that if the company fails then the owner only has to pay back as much as they invested in the company. Whereas a Unlimited Company or PLC has unlimited liability which means that if they run into debt then they have to pay it all back even if it means selling their house and family etc. A PLC can also sell shares.

Actually, a PLC also has Limited Liability as an LTD company has. The difference between those two is, as you say, the fact the PLC can publically trade shares.
 
naffa said:
Well from my GCSE in business studies a company with LTD/Limited liability means that if the company fails and runs into debt then the owner only has to pay back as much as he or she invested in the company. Where as an Unlimited Company or PLC has unlimited liability which means that if they run into debt then they have to pay it all back even if it means selling their house and family etc. A PLC can also sell shares.

Private limited companies and public limited companies both, as their name suggests, have limited liability :)

The difference is that a PLC can "float" its shares on the market (although it's not obliged to at all), whilst a private limited company cannot :)

Edit: I'm pretty sure "company" and "corporation" are synonymous in the legal sense but I'm no expert.
 
The first thing you need to bear in mind is that we're toalking about US definitions here, NOT UK ones. While there are many similarities, there are also differences.

A US Corporation is more of less the same as a UK Limited Company, in that there is separation of ownership from control (i.e. shareholder and directors), limited liability on the part of shareholders (generally, at least), and taxation based on company law.

An LLC (in the US) is a form of business structure that combines many of the features of a company (like limited liability) with the features of a partnership, but has "members", not shareholders or partners. It's a kind of hybrid. But there are considerable implications in terms of the legal structure, reporting requirements, and in terms of profit share and hence, tax implications.

Any incorporated body pays tax on profits at corporate rates, then passes some or all of the excess to owners as dividends, bonuses etc. The owners only pay personal taxes on distributed profits. So, if you retain alarge proportion of funds inside a company to fund growth, personal tax liability is reduced and you have a tax benefit that favours capital growth over income generation. Unincorporated bodies pass all tax liability for profits to the owners, even where funds are retained in the business (to fund expansion, perhaps), and owners therefore pay tax at personal tax rates.

And so on. The differences are numerous, and some of them are quite subtle.
 
Back
Top Bottom