I know the Gene looks nicer...
But seriously, the price difference is £40 or so. They both do Crossfire and SLI, as they both have 2 PCI-E slots that run at x16, x1 or x8, x8. They both have a PCI-E x4 slot and a PCI slot.
Aside from this, they both have support for the same RAM (overclocking wise - though I doubt I'll be pushing to 2200MHz), same CPUs and the cooling seems similar.
In fact, the only reasons I can see for the Gene are:
1. It'll have the snappier POST time and BIOS presentation screen of the two.
2. It looks fancier and prettier...
3. It's got all the ROG gumph.
Have I missed something?
I fully intend on filling all the slots available (2 GTX470s - watercooled, 1 RevoDrive if they turn out as good as the numbers, and a Xonar D1 soundcard), and I'd like those exact slots to be honest, so don't bother suggesting something else.
But seriously, the price difference is £40 or so. They both do Crossfire and SLI, as they both have 2 PCI-E slots that run at x16, x1 or x8, x8. They both have a PCI-E x4 slot and a PCI slot.
Aside from this, they both have support for the same RAM (overclocking wise - though I doubt I'll be pushing to 2200MHz), same CPUs and the cooling seems similar.
In fact, the only reasons I can see for the Gene are:
1. It'll have the snappier POST time and BIOS presentation screen of the two.
2. It looks fancier and prettier...
3. It's got all the ROG gumph.
Have I missed something?
I fully intend on filling all the slots available (2 GTX470s - watercooled, 1 RevoDrive if they turn out as good as the numbers, and a Xonar D1 soundcard), and I'd like those exact slots to be honest, so don't bother suggesting something else.