Hi All,
I am trying to talk my boss into looking at virtualisation. Managed to Load ESXi onto an ML115 and setup a few machines, all is fine and dandy, works but But hes not convinced its worth the risk loading several machines onto the same bit of kit due to 'single point of failure' which i kind of agree with to an extent.
Bit of background as to why im looking at it: we have around 28 servers, most perform 1 task only, usually a simple application, file server, print server, etc.
With all of these servers you can imagine the power usage is insane (mostly dell equipment anything from powervault nas, to poweredge 750/850/1850/2500/2950's) and reducing the power usage by 50% can only make the IT dept look good right?
Now my argument is that the utilisation on these servers are ridiculously low (some barely hit 10% cpu, and 30-40% mem utlization max)
I have suggested vmware to make the most of our hardware, but how do i get around the 'single point of failure' card he keeps drawing?
I think i could reduce our servers by atleast half and still keeping the mission critical DC/Exchange/SQL etc on seperate boxes.
We dont use any types of shared storage (few NAS boxes for backups), purely servers loaded with disks hosting whatever data/application required.
Am i missing something?
Ash
I am trying to talk my boss into looking at virtualisation. Managed to Load ESXi onto an ML115 and setup a few machines, all is fine and dandy, works but But hes not convinced its worth the risk loading several machines onto the same bit of kit due to 'single point of failure' which i kind of agree with to an extent.
Bit of background as to why im looking at it: we have around 28 servers, most perform 1 task only, usually a simple application, file server, print server, etc.
With all of these servers you can imagine the power usage is insane (mostly dell equipment anything from powervault nas, to poweredge 750/850/1850/2500/2950's) and reducing the power usage by 50% can only make the IT dept look good right?
Now my argument is that the utilisation on these servers are ridiculously low (some barely hit 10% cpu, and 30-40% mem utlization max)
I have suggested vmware to make the most of our hardware, but how do i get around the 'single point of failure' card he keeps drawing?
I think i could reduce our servers by atleast half and still keeping the mission critical DC/Exchange/SQL etc on seperate boxes.
We dont use any types of shared storage (few NAS boxes for backups), purely servers loaded with disks hosting whatever data/application required.
Am i missing something?
Ash