• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Does CPU Cache really matter?

Associate
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Posts
2,224
Location
127.0.0.1
Hi guys
I do A LOT of screen recording and transcoding. I mainly use hypercam and the DIVX codec. About 4-5 months ago, I completed the system in my sig with the E6300 CPU that has 2MB of cache. The thing is that when i record at high resolutions, i.e 1920x1080+, many frames are skipped so the playback is faster than normal.

Also in task manager, my cpu usage is no where near 100%, usually 70-80% (while gaming and screen recording at the same time), so the problem isnt cpu speed neither is RAM and hdd speed. So the only other limiting factor i could think of was the CPU cache.

Does cache really make that much of a difference? Do i need a CPU with bigger cache like the E8xxx or Q9xxx CPUs? help!
 
Last edited:
ive also tried camtasia and camstudio with similar results. I get the correct FPS at lower resolutions, its just when im recording at really high ones that it all starts go go wrong
 
Now i have to choose between getting a new Q9550 cpu ~ £170 or
Get a new Core i7 setup: 2.88GHz i7 930 (when its out), X58 mobo, 6GB ddr3 RAM ~ £500
 
Back
Top Bottom