does running 2 displays add lag to games?

Permabanned
Joined
8 Dec 2008
Posts
1,023
Location
East yorkshire near hull
Hey all, i have 2 displays running off my graphics card.

One display is my main and the other is like a extended desktop. When playing games i just use the main display to display the game and the other stays as a extended desktop.

My qestion is any one know if this adds any lag to games. I havnt noticed any noticeable lag before but playing a few games today there was more lag.
 
Like i said i hadnt before.

But playing l4d2 and tf2 they seems more laggy, jsut wanted to rule out the display thing.

Could be my new sound card :|
 
hmm think i see the problem, right now i am jsut on msn and playing music i have 60 processes running and i'm using 3.29 gig of ram, that cant be normal can it? i'm running windows 7.
 
Haven't noticed any difference between 1 or 2 screens, tf2 should play maxed easily, it does on my single gtx260.

Actual memory usage or cache ( superfetch) ?

I have 6gb and it's pretty much always full, about 2.4gb of actual usage when doing nothing ( wmp + internet) and 3.6gb of cache... During games ram usage ( not cache/superfetch!) can rise up to 85% sometimes for me so over 5gb...

It's normal. The more ram you have the better windows makes use of it, I mean it makes sure it uses it as much as possible.

Have you checked a graph with the history of cpu usage, to see if there's an app that eats up a whole core of cpu once in a while causing stutters ingame ?
 
it has done for me on a couple of opengl games like quake 3, goto nvidia control panel > manage 3d settings > multi display/mixed gpu acceleration > single display performance mode, see if that helps
 
I have used my second screen to display system info and task manager for years while playing FPS's online and it makes basically no difference.

Saying that, the things I display on screen B are relatively static, with very little graphical change and hence no real extra load on the GPU. If you are playing online and watching a film on your 2nd screen then you could expect choppy performance, but not 'lag' in the real sense as it would have no increased load on your internet connection.

Snowdog is right as well, you should have a look through the processes (you can do that on screen 2 while playing) and identify any that are hogging cpu time or exessive ram. Vista, and now 7 are both extremely resource hungry and will take any opportunity to jump in on your ram and cpu time.

As well as the other nVidia options, for me (I have mismatched monitors) it was a matter of finding a compromise setting between them. I decreased the refresh rate of A to 80Mhz as that was the highest B could do at my target resolution and still look good. I can play X3TC without AA and watch a film at the same time, with AAx4 it does start to get choppy in combat. If no film is on, just task manager, then AA can go up to 8x no problems.

If thinking about the load from the GPU to two desktops it is best to either balance them (ie both under same load) or bias them (ie one for game, one for task manager). Splitting them (ie two different GPU intensive tasks) can create performance issues.
|/ or \| or \/ from the GPU is ok but || from the GPU is bad! Thats how I remember.

Nice PC btw!
 
It can make a difference depending on a lot of things, the game, graphics card make etc.

For example ETQW did not like me running dual monitors on nvidia graphics cards, have to disable one then it worked fine.
 
Back
Top Bottom