http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cutors-decide-court-case-public-interest.html
A 15 year old boy gets beaten up but the CPS decided the criteria warrants a final warning for the offender.
I find this amazing to be honest, there is such inconsistency within the judiciary.
A 15 year old boy gets beaten up but the CPS decided the criteria warrants a final warning for the offender.
A senior crown prosecutor has reviewed all the facts in this case, including the aggravating and mitigating factors.
‘The circumstances behind this assault fit the national criteria for a final warning, which has now been formally administered by a police officer.
‘Reprimands and warnings are often used as a method of addressing the behaviour of young people with the intervention of the local youth offending team.
‘The views of the victim and his family have been taken into account in reaching this decision.'
I find this amazing to be honest, there is such inconsistency within the judiciary.
