Dog knifed.

If this aint a troll post, then i got to say you got anger problems. You cant go using your navy seal training against someone whos oponion differs from you are you crazy?
I would report your post, but i think you will calm down and you will stop what your doing.

Oh dear, unaware.
 
Nobody actually said that because thats not what the dailymail claimed to have happened. Now I'll happily take your point, if he did return after the fact, he's in the wrong, but the originail article has the following quotes:-



Its fair enough if you'd rather believe the other papers than the dailymail (given their record, and even obvious bias in this story) but out of the three, they're the only paper that actually bothered to ask the guy why he did it. The rest seem to have published the womans side alone and given what she's said, I don't particularly believe her.

The fact that he was released without charge strongly corroborates the daily mails story as well.
 
The rest seem to have published the womans side alone and given what she's said, I don't particularly believe her.

I'd be more inclined to believe her, than somebody who's cold heartedly stabbed a dog 23 times, obviously they will fabricate a story to justify their actions.

The fact that he was released without charge strongly corroborates the daily mails story as well.

He was released on bail. Any charges will be pending further enquiry.
 
I'd be more inclined to believe her, than somebody who's cold heartedly stabbed a dog 23 times, obviously they will fabricate a story to justify their actions.



He was released on bail. Any charges will be pending further enquiry.

If his story was so obviously a fabrication then there would be no need for further enquiries before pressing charges. ;)
 
I'd be more inclined to believe her, than somebody who's cold heartedly stabbed a dog 23 times, obviously they will fabricate a story to justify their actions.



He was released on bail. Any charges will be pending further enquiry.

Normally I would too but the whole "I was pretending I'm dead so he'd leave us alone" and several of the other quotes make it sounds like shes simply not being truthful as she wants to see him punished.

Further to that, the last neighbour mostly collaborates his story. She didn't specifically say she saw him stab the dog (though she may have as "the next thing you know" can be taken either way based on whos saying it), but she says it still had his dog when he left to get the knife, whilst the other article states the opposite without actually backing it up.

Thats not to say I'm actually following the facts of the matter, just my opinion based on the article put in front of me.
 
Both the smaller dog and its owner came out unscathed from a supposedly vicious dog. It wasn't defence on his part at all, pure vengeance.

The fact the majority of you seem to be condoning stabbing another persons animal to death over a relatively minor scuffle is appalling really.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/dog-is-stabbed-23-times-in-frenzied-revenge-attack-8208440.html

http://www.london24.com/news/crime/pet_dog_killed_in_brutal_attack_had_23_stab_wounds_1_1652355

lols, I can tell you felt a little air of victory as you typed this :D

Nobody in this thread would agree with knifing a dog out of revenge, we commented with information given. that the knifing was done to free the owners dog. Knowing the new information, the knifing is completely unacceptable, if it is infact true

That doesnt stop your previous derp comment being utterly moronic though
 
Last edited:
Normally I would too but the whole "I was pretending I'm dead so he'd leave us alone" and several of the other quotes make it sounds like shes simply not being truthful as she wants to see him punished.

Further to that, the last neighbour mostly collaborates his story. She didn't specifically say she saw him stab the dog (though she may have as "the next thing you know" can be taken either way based on whos saying it), but she says it still had his dog when he left to get the knife, whilst the other article states the opposite without actually backing it up.

Thats not to say I'm actually following the facts of the matter, just my opinion based on the article put in front of me.

It all sounds pretty much black and white to me. He took his dog out, this one came bounding up and started throttling it, with no owner in sight. He ran back into his house, grabbed a couple of kitchen knives and set about it. The owner then came forward a couple of minutes later.

He did what he needed to to save his older mutt, and I'd have done the same. It must have happened on his doorstep, Bulldog to outright kill a smaller specimen. It's not like he took 10 minutes to jog home and grab a couple of knives.

By all accounts, that dog was a menace and as sad as it is, it's now dead.

One can only hope the owner doesn't feel the need to rush out and grab another one.
 
Back
Top Bottom