Your welcome! And I'm genuinely glad you read it
(My degree was in molecular genetics and I always had a keen interest in Virology)This one, it was in reply to Panos (and the last 2 lines in reply to Tang0)
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
Your welcome! And I'm genuinely glad you read it
(My degree was in molecular genetics and I always had a keen interest in Virology)This one, it was in reply to Panos (and the last 2 lines in reply to Tang0)
Your welcome! And I'm genuinely glad you read it
This one, it was in reply to Panos (and the last 2 lines in reply to Tang0)
I think these comments deflected from the discussion (Gen flynn) based.
Caporegime
So seeing as twitter is now fact checking the orange jackass.
Has he had his daily meltdown over it??
It’s great to see Twitter, one of his favourite social media platforms to spew his stupidity, is now fact checking him lol.
Has he had his daily meltdown over it??
It’s great to see Twitter, one of his favourite social media platforms to spew his stupidity, is now fact checking him lol.
You've called it both the 'Wuhan Coronavirus' and 'Wuhan virus' so you're just splitting hairs now, and TBH based on your past failures to have conversations in good faith there seems to be little point in bothering about semantics as despite all the evidence you're incapable of accepting when you're wrong.I didn't call it that...
You do know people can search the forums for what you've said in the past, right?
This is exactly what i mean, how many times has it been now that that's been explained to you? I know for a fact this will be the third time that I've explained to you that they only called it that when it did not have an official name and when it did they stopped using that name and started using it's official name, the question is why haven't you?
No, other people were discussing that and you took things off topic by referring to it as the 'Wuhan Coronavirus' (happy now?), and since then we've been trying to establish if you're doing that because you're a racist or if you have a credible alternative explanation, something you've gone to great efforts to avoid.
I would've thought you'd jump at the chance to put forward your side of the story, to tell everyone why calling it the 'Wuhan Coronavirus' months after it's been given an official taxonomical name is not intended to stigmatize a particular race of people as I, and i suspect others, assume it is.
Permabanned
Yes he ranted about free speech and threatened them about it.
Still looking for something that does not exist, yawn OK.
Freakbro did your work for you anyway.
He has indeed
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 28,909
Free speech to make up ********!
So you're saying that pointing out that someone failed to address the points someone else raised and telling them not attempt throwing in a red herring (literally an attempt to misleads or distracts from a relevant or important question) by using ad hominem attacks is somehow in-itself deflection.
What are you on about, what am i looking for and what work would that be?
Caporegime
Lol brilliant. The sooner Twitter puts a muzzle on him permanently the better. Mind you it took them long enough to start fact checking his stupid ****.
His threats are just so empty and devoid of any common sense that no one takes them seriously anymore.
Permabanned
heh, just had a look at Gab, never heard of it before. Appears to be a cess pit of nutters.
Perfect place for him and his flock then.
It appears spanky has just woken up,
He is grumpy this morning
Last edited:
The article I was referring to isSorry, I thought your initial question was because you actually wanted to know the answer and as such might have put a modicum of effort in finding it (like type into google) when someone pointed you the direction. But, none the less, here you go
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-020-0709-x
Not sure that's the exact article Snail was referring to, but it goes into some depth about the reasoning behind why the nomenclature of Virus taxonomy is based on the classical Linnaean hierarchical system of organisms.
Now that I answered your question, can you please answer mine and explain to me what in Murphys post was a deflection?
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01009-0
it dissects the issues surrounding naming a virus after a geographical location.
They should just automatically put a **NEEDS CITATION** on any of his tweets that can’t be verified. (Basically all of them I guess?!)
Or make it like the justice zone in Red Dwarf. So if he tweets some untrue rubbish it deletes it and posts #Biden2020 or something in support of whatever he posted against.
Or make it like the justice zone in Red Dwarf. So if he tweets some untrue rubbish it deletes it and posts #Biden2020 or something in support of whatever he posted against.
Soldato
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2006
- Posts
- 3,700
Accusing someone of murder is overstepping the mark but he doesn't seem phased by it.
Notice how his beef with Twitter and other social media platforms suddenly becomes the focus of his talking point for no better reason because his ego was bruised after he got embarrassed by Twitter. What a complete man child. Can you imagine any other past President regardless if Rep or Den behaved like this?
Exactly if anyone else did this to Trump, you would never get away with it.
Last edited:
- Status