-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Downsampling on 120/144hz monitors
- Thread starter Ayahuasca
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 7,490
Asus VG278H
2560x1440 120Hz
2560x1440 120Hz
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
My benQ freaked out at 1200p @100hz
Nice, mine won't do 120hz, it will do more than 96 but I've read it's best to have it in stages of 24? 144 - 120 - 96 - 72. Not sure what the reasoning is behind it.
Will do this fine but really did notice the difference in motion going back to 60 again
Will do this fine but really did notice the difference in motion going back to 60 again
Yer 120Hz is nice but given the choice of 4K or 120Hz, I would take 4K. I do miss 3D Gaming though but will get my VG278H set back up at some stage.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2011
- Posts
- 20,679
- Location
- The KOP
Am different, I pick refresh rate all day long. I just can't get used to anything below 120hz now.
Can't wait for 1440p 120hz
Can't wait for 1440p 120hz
I guess a 4k monitor looks a lot better than a downsampled 4k resolution as well?
Much better.
Silly Q, how to do this?
A lot better - take eve online for instance where the background stars are a generated background rather than a prerendered image so scale with resoultion - at 4K you actually have 4x as many stars in the background as 1920x because at 1920x some of them are so small they don't even exist as 1 pixel, with say 2560x downsampling then the stars that are rendered properly are slightly sharper and you get a bit of a blur in place of some of the extra stars that aren't normally rendered at 1920x but none of the sharpness and detail on the extra stars as 4K gets.
