-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
driver
- Thread starter philkf
- Start date
Use the latest nvidia beta driver as they give the best performance IMO
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
Official 163.71's if your on XP :- http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winxp_163.71_uk.html
or if your on Vista, 163.71 beta's 32bit :- http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winvista_x86_163.71_uk.html
64bit :- http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winvista_x64_163.71_uk.html
or if your on Vista, 163.71 beta's 32bit :- http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winvista_x86_163.71_uk.html
64bit :- http://www.nvidia.co.uk/object/winvista_x64_163.71_uk.html
Is the 163.44 not the best?. My m8 doesn't know how to overclock, so the independent shader clock wouldn't be good for him to start learning with his GTX's.
Is 163.44 the last driver that the shader clock increases with the core clock?.
Is 163.44 the last driver that the shader clock increases with the core clock?.