• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Dual core harder to overclock?

lemonkettaz said:
Is it harder to overclock than a single core.. or is it just the same


Its procedure is pretty much the same as a siingle core. There is usually a bit more heat generated though and also with 2 cores there is more chance of one of them being a poor clocker and holding you back.
 
Dual-core certainly throws out more heat!!

I've just got my opty 170 and clocked it to 2.5ghz and look at this!!!

temps.jpg
 
Not surprising that it kicks out more heat really :) What cooler is that with? My XP-120 keeps my X2 @ 2.66GHz at between 50 and 55 degrees C after having been loaded with 24 hours of two Prime95 instances - that's with 1.45 volts too. Still, 51 isn't too much to worry about.
 
Phemo said:
Not surprising that it kicks out more heat really :) What cooler is that with? My XP-120 keeps my X2 @ 2.66GHz at between 50 and 55 degrees C after having been loaded with 24 hours of two Prime95 instances - that's with 1.45 volts too. Still, 51 isn't too much to worry about.

I'm using a ThermalTake Silent Tower but am considering water cooling with this kind of themps!!

I'm just impressed that its doing 2.5ghz on 1.35V and it stable as you like. This CPU feels like it can go miles further but the heat is going to be the limiting factor.

What temps should I be worried about?
 
I think OC'ing a Dual Core would be similar to running two hard drives in RAID-0. There are considerable performance gains to be had, yet the RAID (or CPU in this case) would only be as fast as it's slowest part.

Having said that, the X2's all seem to be stonking overclockers.
 
with my 170, im not having problems with cpu heat (using water) but the PWMIC area on my dfi ultra-d gets hotter n hotter the more i push the cpu. at 2.7ghz with 1.39v it not really a problem but for 2.8ghz it needs 1.48v on the core and the PWMIC is hitting 67-70 degrees. The cpu seems stable till the PWMIC hits these temps
 
SpudMaster said:
with my 170, im not having problems with cpu heat (using water) but the PWMIC area on my dfi ultra-d gets hotter n hotter the more i push the cpu. at 2.7ghz with 1.39v it not really a problem but for 2.8ghz it needs 1.48v on the core and the PWMIC is hitting 67-70 degrees. The cpu seems stable till the PWMIC hits these temps

I was having a similar issue after changing from the xp120 (which cooled the pwmic area) to the Evo 120 which doesn't! I fixed a low power Papst 120mm fan to blow over both my ram and pwmic heatsinks and used a 4-3 pin connector to use the m/board pwmic fan header and Smartguardian to control the fanspeed according to temperature. When browsing etc fans are quiet, when gaming they are probably noisy but with the sound up who care's! Temps are no longer a problem.
 
X2s are good clockers, however, I have some observations:
1. They don't go as far as the single cores
2. One core is normally better than the other, i.e. one core will be stable at a given speed but the other core needs more volts to get stable

Hav
 
Havana_UK said:
X2s are good clockers, however, I have some observations:
1. They don't go as far as the single cores
2. One core is normally better than the other, i.e. one core will be stable at a given speed but the other core needs more volts to get stable

Hav


is there a way to tell if 1 core is better the other ?
 
Ping said:
is there a way to tell if 1 core is better the other ?

Yes run an instance of Prime on each core or some other stress testing program, if one fails the test prematurely or earlier than the other core, you have your answer. :)
 
Ping said:
is there a way to tell if 1 core is better the other ?

they way I did it was to run one instance of Prime95, and change affinity from one core to the next while the test was running.

It failed quite quickly on Core 0 until I up'd the volts.

Core 1 ran nicely at stock volts at 2.6GHz, but Core 0 needed 1.45V to get it stable.

Hav
 
IzaLearnin said:
I was having a similar issue after changing from the xp120 (which cooled the pwmic area) to the Evo 120 which doesn't! I fixed a low power Papst 120mm fan to blow over both my ram and pwmic heatsinks and used a 4-3 pin connector to use the m/board pwmic fan header and Smartguardian to control the fanspeed according to temperature.
I have always thought that its better to have a large fan blowing air down onto the CPU and surrounding circuitry, but it seems a lot of people place the cooling emphasis on their CPU alone.

From what I have read and some personal experience it seems to help keep things running smooth. Also the power regulators don't function as well when they start to boil, the effect of this can be a fluctuating vCore which doesn't help an overclock at all.

The PWM area of my old overclocked P4 would hit 70°C no problem when I was using the stock fan, but when I changed to the SP-94 + 92mm YS-Tech the temps in this area dropped to about 36°C

Super-PI times were the same though! :p
 
Back
Top Bottom