Dualshock 3 controller better than the contoller that came with the ps3?

Associate
Joined
14 Aug 2003
Posts
1,984
Location
cyberspace
I can't used to the controller that came with the ps3 -it just feels to light.
Would the Dualshock 3 Wireless Controller be alittle heavier?
 
Last edited:
Not only is it heavier, it's sturdier, made of more expensive higher quality plastics, better analog sticks with lessened deadzone, more sensitive triggers with less resistance, easier face buttons to manipulate in terms of pressing pressure, the whole works.

It's like that scene in Snake Eater where Snake gets the custom 1911. You'll feel like that when you get a hold of one of these babies.
 
Not only is it heavier, it's sturdier, made of more expensive higher quality plastics, better analog sticks with lessened deadzone, more sensitive triggers with less resistance, easier face buttons to manipulate in terms of pressing pressure, the whole works.

Until you knock over a three foot tall speaker onto it while it's sat on a wooden floor.
 
32.99 the best, its a lot for a pad, I know its no more than the other console's but still I rem thinking 15 for n64 was crazy.
 
No theyre not.


Yes they are, tho I’m comparing it to a ps3 I bought in may.


Not only that but they aren’t any where near as good as the dual shock 2.


No, there's a clear difference. It's easily noticed in first person shooters. The camera in MGS4 is also very different between the two controllers.

Ive been putting some time in battlefield bc and its still as bad as the six axis
 
I traded one of my Six Axis controllers in for £14 odd and put it towards a DS3, which was £38 for a local exchange place. I had other vouchers left over as well though :)
 
Ive been putting some time in battlefield bc and its still as bad as the six axis

thats just because battlefield bc sensitivity is absolute crap...

i didnt notice a huge difference in the controllers but i can definitely say that in bfbc is an issue with the game and not the controller.
 
Back
Top Bottom