Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
From ATI, probably something like the 4730: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-200-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1434
Then Now (Nvidia) Now (Ati/AMD)
8800 Ultra GTX 295 HD 5870
8800 GTX GTX 285 HD 5850
8800 GTS 640 GTX 275 HD 5770
8800 GTS 320 GTX 260 HD 4890
8800 GS GTS 250 HD 4850
Why would you want something that performs the same?
Do you mean what would be the equivalent card in the range compared to the range when you bought the 8800GTS?
In which case the 8800GTS 320MB was like a middle range card.
Nowdays it might look a bit like this (for Ati its more difficult to exactly match, but then it always has been)
Also I'm not too sure about putting the GTX295 in other than on a price/perf basis in which case its valid.
Then Now (Nvidia) Now (Ati/AMD)
8800 Ultra GTX 295 HD 5870
8800 GTX GTX 285 HD 5850
8800 GTS 640 GTX 275 HD 4890
8800 GTS 320 GTX 260 HD 4870/5770(4870 is faster, 5770 has better features)
8800 GS GTS 250 HD 4850/5750
Biffa, I had a similar thought but he probably just wants a replacement for a broken 320MB.
I would disagree with your rankings.


Thats why I asked. Just a bit of a wierd way of wording it, if you were the type of person who bough a 8800GTS then, I'd have thought you would be the type of person to buy a 4890 or GTX260 now
Otherwise your mods to my graphs are appreciated, I knew that section (47xx/48xx) would be a minefield![]()
].