Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2004
- Posts
- 3,278
E4300 1.8ghz 9x multiplier
E6300 1.86ghz 7x multiplier
So let's say I overclocked each cpu to 3.6ghz
E4300 1.8ghz (200mhz fsb stock)
400x9 = 3600mhz (400mhz x 4 = 1600mhz fsb)
E6300 1.86ghz (266mhz fsb stock)
514x7 = 3600mhz (514mhz x 4 = ~2056mhz fsb) This seems a bit unlikely to achieve due to the already high FSB
Will the E4300 be the better option for overclocking?
A lower multipler means the fsb can be set less and achieve higher overclocks, like I have calculated above? Am I correct?
E6300 1.86ghz 7x multiplier
So let's say I overclocked each cpu to 3.6ghz
E4300 1.8ghz (200mhz fsb stock)
400x9 = 3600mhz (400mhz x 4 = 1600mhz fsb)
E6300 1.86ghz (266mhz fsb stock)
514x7 = 3600mhz (514mhz x 4 = ~2056mhz fsb) This seems a bit unlikely to achieve due to the already high FSB
Will the E4300 be the better option for overclocking?
A lower multipler means the fsb can be set less and achieve higher overclocks, like I have calculated above? Am I correct?
Last edited: