• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

E6300 = Allendale or Conroe?

Soldato
Joined
28 Dec 2004
Posts
7,620
Location
Derry
I was reading wiki just now and it mentioned that Intel have confirmed that the 6300/6400 are not Allendale and are Conroes with the extra 2mb of cache disabled, is this true?

For a very long time, it was considered that stripped down versions of the Conroe processors were code-named Allendale. In actuality, Allendale is a code-name for a different processor. Many suggest that E6300 and E6400 are actually code-named Allendale, however, the E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz) processors are not code-named Allendale because they physically have 4MB cache, same as their big brothers E6600 and E6700 - it is just that half of their physical memory is disabled. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled (this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating). The fact that E6300 and E6400 are not code-named Allendale and actually code-named Conroe has been confirmed by Intel themselves.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2
 
wizardmaxx said:
Wiki also says that "An E4300 Allendale (1.8 GHz, 800 MT/s FSB) will be released in the 1st quarter of 2007."

If im correct then this statement is not true. The new ones will be 1 core, 1mb cache and will be called Millville.

You're thinking of Core 2 Solo's, they're not going to be the 4300's. The solo's are apparently codenames Conroe-L
 
Back
Top Bottom