Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
hi
would i see any diff by going to e8400? or should i go quad?
i mostly play games...
thanks for the votes.. will order e8400 know...
many thanks..
p.s will post results when installed..
when i bought it i paid about £160. for it.. might get £50-£60? for it problem is its lapped..
I think you may be dissapointed by your "upgrade". It's more of a sidestep really. A E6600 at 3.6Ghz is no slouch and you will only see a minimal improvement. I had a E8500 and even at 4.2Ghz it was'nt much faster than the E6600 i have now. 3DMark06 for example, only gave the Wolfdale an extra 588 marks over the E6600. You just don't need a 4Ghz cpu to play any current games.
I think you may be dissapointed by your "upgrade". It's more of a sidestep really. A E6600 at 3.6Ghz is no slouch and you will only see a minimal improvement. I had a E8500 and even at 4.2Ghz it was'nt much faster than the E6600 i have now. 3DMark06 for example, only gave the Wolfdale an extra 588 marks over the E6600. You just don't need a 4Ghz cpu to play any current games.
I am quite surprised at your small improvement in 3DMark06 when moving from an E6600 @ 3.6ghz to an E8400 @ 4.2ghz. Is that with the same graphics card(s) and motherboard?
When I upgraded from the same E6600 @ 3.6ghz to my current E8400 @ 4.1ghz, my 3DMark06 jumped from 15,200 to 18,002 that is on the identical systm of an EVGA 780i and SLi BFG 8800GT OC2.