Associate
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 1,770
Which is quicker overall?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
e6600 v e7300
- Thread starter I_M_Weasel
- Start date
e7300. I read a review doing that exact comparison. They reduced the multi of the e7300 from 10x266 2.66GHz to 9x266 2.4GHz (the same as the e6600) and even underclocked, the e7300 was still faster everytime.
EDIT: think I've found it Link It's in spanish but just look at the figures. Remember, thats with the e7300 underlocked to the same speed as the e6600.
EDIT: think I've found it Link It's in spanish but just look at the figures. Remember, thats with the e7300 underlocked to the same speed as the e6600.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2008
- Posts
- 1,770
Quite close on equal clocks but generally the 7300 wins and would by even more on its proper clock, thanks for the link.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 12 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 21,914
- Location
- Aberlour, NE Scotland
In that review it's more or less even. The E7300 win's most of the top ones and the E6600 win's most of the bottom ones. I reckon that for gaming and if both cpu's were clocked to 3.6Ghz then the E6600 would be best due to the extra cache. The E7300 should have more clocking headroom though.