He intentionally wanted to look like a fool?
Do you seirously think Ed Milliband is prime minister material?
No, I don't think he wanted to look like a fool. I think he wanted it so that a broadcaster wouldn't be able to use an answer he didn't want on the news, and the broadcaster wouldn't broadcast repeating answers. I wonder when it got broadcast on the news how exactly it went out?
I don't really care about politics (liars and crooks with their own personal agenda), I'm just making an observation.
Can anyone imagine this guy leading our country?
Would it not have been best to just not do the interview then, than come across as a complete dolt?
Your scenario makes no sense.
I think this thread is posted in a reckless & provocative way & think the posters should sit round the table forget the rhetoric & negotiate.
Damn Hippys get everywhere these days.
![]()
This doesn't appear to be a normal interview to me, it appears to be a rapid question and answer thing where they will use snippets to show on the news. In that scenario it makes total sense. Don't get me wrong, it's a really crappy thing to do, but it's the only way I see why he did that. As I said, I bet the whole thing was not broadcast and they only showed a singular answer.
Playing the whole thing he does indeed look like a tool hence my "wow." I put at the beginning. I'm not arguing with you, I'm trying to understand why it was like that.
I think this thread is posted in a reckless & provocative way & think the posters should sit round the table forget the rhetoric & negotiate.
It's clearly this, and I bet it goes on more often that people realise, it's just that typically you only see the 30 second snippet of one answer being given.
Don't get what you mean, can you reiterate?