26 Jul 2007 at 09:01 #21 elfy elfy Associate Joined 15 Feb 2007 Posts 485 as said previously it is in fact 2xc2d stuck together so those temps sound fine
26 Jul 2007 at 09:20 #22 marscay marscay Soldato Joined 15 Aug 2006 Posts 3,422 Location 127.0.0.1 Kingy1968 said: Can anyone give me any info on what more I can do to get the temps lower?? Thanks Guys Click to expand... put it under water, that's about all you can do. i wouldn't worry about those temps ....for air they're quite good.
Kingy1968 said: Can anyone give me any info on what more I can do to get the temps lower?? Thanks Guys Click to expand... put it under water, that's about all you can do. i wouldn't worry about those temps ....for air they're quite good.
26 Jul 2007 at 10:23 #23 juno_first juno_first Soldato Joined 18 Apr 2003 Posts 2,684 Location England quad deffo run hotter, mine runs 50 idle, 85 load. if its stable & not throttling id not worrey. i hear intels can run >100c 4 12yr anyway.
quad deffo run hotter, mine runs 50 idle, 85 load. if its stable & not throttling id not worrey. i hear intels can run >100c 4 12yr anyway.
26 Jul 2007 at 12:13 #24 2bullish 2bullish Associate Joined 21 Jan 2005 Posts 762 Location Manchester I have the exact same setup apart from the fans and I get the exact same temps for the same clock. Its right.
I have the exact same setup apart from the fans and I get the exact same temps for the same clock. Its right.
26 Jul 2007 at 12:16 #25 stickroad stickroad Permabanned Joined 29 Dec 2006 Posts 3,817 They are perfectly fine for an overclock of 3.2ghz.