EFM - Speed Vs Bandwidth

Not commonplace fortunately. We have a number of voice assured (but connection not?) ADSL lines with them.

Total downtime wasn't far off 24 hours :eek:
 
It did us - 6 offices all running off 1 mobile each office. The irony is the provider insisted we should use them as our existing ISP wasn't reliable enough. 1-0 to our ISP so far!
 
It did us - 6 offices all running off 1 mobile each office. The irony is the provider insisted we should use them as our existing ISP wasn't reliable enough. 1-0 to our ISP so far!

Haha! :) To be fair, if it's just a salesman saying that, they're just basing it on the statistics/marketing gumpf that they are told to say.

I used to sell VF One Net; "Never miss a call!", "Constantly Connecting", "99.9% up time".. etc. etc... the system must have crashed 6 times in the first few months of it being available, leaving me to feel like a right tw*t after quoting Vodafone - since then I've never sold a product I haven't tested the crap out of myself! :P
 
Funny you should say that - when we were shopping for a phone system we narrowed it down to Horizon or OneNet - from what we can tell we were better off with Horizon than OneNet despite the outage!
 
I think you may be better off getting the 2Mbps EFM line for VOIP and then getting an ADSL for data as long as upload isn't critical. Plenty of cheap decent load balancing routers around. Having 10 users working with phones and internet on a 2/4Mbps line will just wind up with people moaning at you constantly until that fibre gets in.

Hey guys, fibre is a possibility in the area but it's very expensive. You mention about openreach etc not being able to fix it etc. "Apparently", because the EFM is going to be installed and assured by Gamma, there's SLA's in place because they own every part of the infrastructure, limiting downtime?

The only benefit would be less hops to Gamma and slightly lower latency. Gamma won't own everything up to the termination point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom