entry level, mid range and pro dslr is there a difference?

Associate
Joined
14 Jun 2011
Posts
182
ppl always say that its in the photographer not the camera which takes good photos. so my question is does it really matter whether i get an entry level mid and top of the range camera? ive had a canon 500d before and sold it on to upgrade into a mid range camera but now i regret selling it on.. can someone enlighten me? :)
 
You'll find that the camera body affects the image very little given the 2 camera bodies are within the same generations, the lens plays a much bigger part. You ll find a lot of the sensors going from an entry level dslr to a mid level one are actually the same and the only different between them are usually ergonomics, environmental sealings and added functionality.

It's much cheaper for companies to produce a set of sensors and distribute it throughout it's line up with different levels of functionality than creating a bespoke sensor for each model. Think car manufacturers that uses the same engine in a variety of different models and trim levels, this is the same principle.

One of my all time favourite photographer uses a Canon Rebel XTI (400D) with kit lens and a 50mm 1.8, he does however have to compliment it with, a great lighting system that he uses to great effect. It just goes to prove that a lot of the time the photographer is the weakest link in the system.

the main reason why i regret selling my 500d. but the main thing i had difficulties with is when there isnt any sufficient light available thats is why i thought of selling my 500d and upgrade. but is it really the case that my old camera is just having difficulties with not enough lighting? i had a 50mm 1.8 lens and i really enjoyed having it but i was limited with range and the sad thing was it fell on the carpeted floor and cracked the body.. :(
 
Back
Top Bottom