• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Equivalent? ATI - nVidia

Associate
Joined
16 Aug 2005
Posts
631
Location
Nottingham
If i got a:
ATI Radeon X1600 graphics with 128MB GDDR3 memory

What card would this be mainly like from nVidia, a 6600GT?

Long time since i have used pc hardware, just migrated to MAC :D
 
If its a pro, then the 6600 GT is better, if its an XT then its better than the 6600 GT. :)

Good review here , conclusion has it as an x1600 XL, but thats a mistake as its an XT, so go for an XT as the pro is a terrible card. :)
 
Last edited:
ACESHIGH said:
Slower than a 6600GT, faster than a 6600 if what LoadsaMoney said is correct.

Yeah its slower than the 6600 GT, even the x1600pro is slower than a 6600 GT, and the x1600 in the imac is slower than a pro as its a mobility as said, im sure i read somewhere the clocks were less than on the pro.
 
so, gaming quality will it be any good or not?

128mb, if i upgraded it to 256mb, would there be a great increase.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom