errr, 2124?

VeNT

VeNT

VeNT

Soldato
Joined
9 Jan 2003
Posts
21,087
Location
Cornwall
how long do these normaly take?
my core duo rig says that its going to take over 1d 14h to finish it at current rate!

Code: 
[02:52:53] + Attempting to send results
[02:52:53] - Reading file work/wuresults_05.dat from core
[02:52:53]   (Read 8546182 bytes from disk)
[02:52:53] Connecting to http://171.64.122.128:8080/
[02:57:34] Posted data.
[02:57:35] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~29 kB/s
[02:57:38] - Averaged speed for that direction ~25 kB/s
[02:57:38] + Results successfully sent
[02:57:38] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[02:57:38] + Number of Units Completed: 5

[02:57:42] Trying to send all finished work units
[02:57:42] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[02:57:42] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[02:57:42] + Attempting to get work packet
[02:57:42] - Will indicate memory of 1022 MB
[02:57:42] - Connecting to assignment server
[02:57:42] Connecting to http://assign.stanford.edu:8080/
[02:57:43] Posted data.
[02:57:43] Initial: 41AB; - Successful: assigned to (171.65.103.160).
[02:57:43] + News From Folding@Home: Welcome to Folding@Home
[02:57:43] Loaded queue successfully.
[02:57:43] Connecting to http://171.65.103.160:8080/
[02:57:44] Posted data.
[02:57:44] Initial: 0000; - Receiving payload (expected size: 79479)
[02:57:45] - Downloaded at ~77 kB/s
[02:57:45] - Averaged speed for that direction ~88 kB/s
[02:57:45] + Received work.
[02:57:45] Trying to send all finished work units
[02:57:45] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[02:57:45] + Closed connections
[02:57:45] 
[02:57:45] + Processing work unit
[02:57:45] Core required: FahCore_78.exe
[02:57:45] Core found.
[02:57:45] Working on Unit 06 [October 21 02:57:45]
[02:57:45] + Working ...
[02:57:45] - Calling 'FahCore_78.exe -dir work/ -suffix 06 -checkpoint 15 -service -forceasm -verbose -lifeline 3040 -version 504'

[02:57:46] 
[02:57:46] *------------------------------*
[02:57:46] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[02:57:46] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[02:57:46] 
[02:57:46] Preparing to commence simulation
[02:57:46] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[02:57:46] - Not checking prior termination.
[02:57:46] - Expanded 78967 -> 420497 (decompressed 532.4 percent)
[02:57:46] - Starting from initial work packet
[02:57:46] 
[02:57:46] Project: 2124 (Run 25, Clone 22, Gen 8)
[02:57:46] 
[02:57:46] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[02:57:46] Entering M.D.
[02:57:52] Protein: p2124_lambda_5way_melt_4_10011
[02:57:52] 
[02:57:52] Writing local files
[02:57:52] Using table 3
[02:57:52] Extra SSE boost OK.
[02:57:52] Writing local files
[02:57:52] Completed 0 out of 20000000 steps  (0)
[03:12:52] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[03:27:52] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[03:42:52] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[03:46:32] Writing local files
[03:46:32] Completed 200000 out of 20000000 steps  (1)
[04:01:32] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[04:16:02] Writing local files
[04:16:02] Completed 400000 out of 20000000 steps  (2)
[04:32:01] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[04:43:48] Writing local files
[04:43:48] Completed 600000 out of 20000000 steps  (3)
[04:59:48] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[05:07:50] - Autosending finished units...
[05:07:50] Trying to send all finished work units
[05:07:50] + No unsent completed units remaining.
[05:07:50] - Autosend completed
[05:11:35] Writing local files
[05:11:35] Completed 800000 out of 20000000 steps  (4)
[05:27:35] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[05:39:16] Writing local files
[05:39:16] Completed 1000000 out of 20000000 steps  (5)
[05:55:16] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[06:07:01] Writing local files
[06:07:01] Completed 1200000 out of 20000000 steps  (6)
[06:23:01] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[06:34:44] Writing local files
[06:34:44] Completed 1400000 out of 20000000 steps  (7)
[06:50:43] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[07:02:27] Writing local files
[07:02:27] Completed 1600000 out of 20000000 steps  (8)
[07:18:27] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[07:30:15] Writing local files
[07:30:15] Completed 1800000 out of 20000000 steps  (9)
[07:46:15] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[07:58:15] Writing local files
[07:58:15] Completed 2000000 out of 20000000 steps  (10)
[08:14:14] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[08:26:10] Writing local files
[08:26:10] Completed 2200000 out of 20000000 steps  (11)
[08:42:10] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[08:53:03] Writing local files
[08:53:03] Completed 2400000 out of 20000000 steps  (12)
[09:09:03] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[09:19:54] Writing local files
[09:19:54] Completed 2600000 out of 20000000 steps  (13)
[09:35:54] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[09:46:50] Writing local files
[09:46:50] Completed 2800000 out of 20000000 steps  (14)
[10:02:50] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[10:13:53] Writing local files
[10:13:53] Completed 3000000 out of 20000000 steps  (15)
[10:29:53] Timered checkpoint triggered.
[10:40:48] Writing local files
[10:40:48] Completed 3200000 out of 20000000 steps  (16)
[10:56:48] Timered checkpoint triggered.


ideas?
 
from my benchies bit on fahmon for the 2124,

x2 gets 170ppd
pd gets 158ppd
t2600 gets 120ppd
p4 gets 101ppd
a64 gets 104ppd

compair that against the ppd for yours, mine took about a day.
 
SiriusB said:
Yeah the 2124s are awful. My [email protected] does them at 115PPD. Compare that to another 600 pointer, 2414 which gets me around 300PPD!

SiriusB
Click to expand...
there's a big difference between the two - the 600 pointers are effectively 300 point WUs with an extra 100% bonus points due to the amount of RAM used making them worth 600

the 2124 is a 396 pointer which uses almost no resources but just takes a long time - that said the points are a little low and they aren't much quicker on a top of the range rig than something quite long in the tooth :o
 
1809, 18 oh sodding 9
I've FOUR of these running atm, every one of my core duo PCs is locked down with a sodding 18 bleeding 09.
153 points at about 139ppd
 
VeNT said:
1809, 18 oh sodding 9
I've FOUR of these running atm, every one of my core duo PCs is locked down with a sodding 18 bleeding 09.
153 points at about 139ppd
Click to expand...
The opty gets 210 :D

Oh yeah, bought a better opty from MM, was doing 3ghz at 1.4 apparently, which is very nice indeed. £50 or so, should be able to sell the current one at auction for that :cool:
 
Yep, It's official in my books too, these WU's are a pain.

the 2124's thru 2136's that's I've done at home are all averaging between 23min and 48min per step (224ppd to 117ppd)

Best = E6800 @ 23min ave.
Worst = 1.7 PM Laptop @ 48min ave.

For the Amber 1809, I've only gotten them on my Laptop for some reason, which is good, as it's only 153pts. It's averaging about 23min per step or 110ppd.

But it's all good for the science :D

Quesiton: Didn't we have a Benchmark web-site at one point? Is it still in operation?
.
 
Information is a bit out of date though - can any one submit? - didn't really have time to fully look around site.

428 best PPD - I think not! :D

Was actually planning on compiling the PPD / core / Mobo / user stats myself - If people want to share their Fahmon files (and a basic spec of each machine the threads are on) with me I'll add your results to that of my varied farm. Amd's results are especially welcome as I've none of thoses crunching from me.

It will be in a xls format - for everone's use (if you ask nicely :D )
 
Last edited:
sometimes you get good days!

Project : 2414
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 600


-- Folding 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 16mn 09s - 534.98 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 20mn 16s - 426.32 ppd

Project : 2412
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 600


-- Folding 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 16mn 22s - 527.90 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 20mn 18s - 425.62 ppd


sometimes you get bad days

Project : 1815
Core : Amber
Frames : 100
Credit : 153


-- Folding 1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 10mn 46s - 204.63 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 34s - 162.40 ppd

Project : 1809
Core : Amber
Frames : 100
Credit : 153


-- Folding 1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 46s - 187.24 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 11mn 57s - 184.37 ppd


but it seems I had both today!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom