Euro talks, what are the implications?

Soldato
Joined
13 Dec 2010
Posts
4,219
Apologies if someone has already started a thread on this.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16104275

Most people must have seen this by now? To summarise, david cameron has opted not to sign the treaty on greater union of eu members. Meaning they would have to take their treaty outside the EU.

Me personally, I believe this is sensible, as the EU would still be in place, but the more risky integration of eurozone members would be taken outside the EU.
 
exactly, all Cameron managed to do was weaken Britain's position at negotiating table for the sake of a few bankers. i love the argument that this was to save valuable jobs in banking industry which have caused the loss of many more jobs in other industries, not to mention threaten hard working people's pensions

So we should have signed up and waved goodbye to one of the largest financial centres in the world?

Theres nothing to say the banks wouldn't just pass the charges onto us anyway.
 
All the bankers appearing on bbc news seem to be saying the same thing. Won't make a difference to us, France Germany etc have been spending too much and are now seeking to get money from elsewhere.

All these opposition politicians are jumping on the bandwagon claiming we've failed. Failed to what? Join this pact of doom between european idiots?

FTSE 100 closed up.........seems the sun will rise in the East tomorrow, and the Earth will still spin on its axis!
 
Why do the other Europeans seem hell bent on fiscal union? Thats what I can't get my head around.

It hasn't worked surely? They have taken a trade movement and perverted it to create an insitution to keep politicians in jobs and carry on dictating to others.
 
The city lending money to governments is like those pay day loans.

The people who default on their loans blame the system, rather than the fact that they couldn't afford to pay it.

Sending blame elsewhere.

Welcome to the Germanic union...........
 
Back
Top Bottom