Europa League Introduces 5 Man Ref Team

Caporegime
Joined
1 Mar 2008
Posts
26,303
Source: Four Four Two

Football will undergo one of its most radical changes this week when the Europa League's group stage kicks off with five-man refereeing teams.

The rebranded UEFA Cup competition is to feature an additional assistant referee beside each goal to help judge whether players have dived in the penalty box and committed fouls at set-pieces, and also determine if the ball has crossed the goal-line.

The system will be unveiled at 24 matches on Thursday with high-profile teams like Ajax Amsterdam, Valencia, AS Roma, Panathinaikos, PSV Eindhoven and Sporting Lisbon involved.

Officials are hoping it can drastically reduce the number of refereeing mistakes - often cruelly exposed by television replays - without using video technology.

UEFA president Michel Platini and FIFA counterpart Sepp Blatter are firmly opposed to technology, with the exception of microphones and headsets used by match officials to communicate with each other.

"Things have not improved in refereeing for more than 100 years. I am against video technology because that will take the human face away from the game but this system will help the referee make the right decision," Platini said last month.

"It could be the most significant change in the way the game is officiated for over 100 years."

The last major rule change came in 1992 when goalkeepers were banned from handling back passes following an outcry over negative play at the World Cup in Italy two years earlier.

BRAZILIAN EXPERIMENT

Nine years ago a low-key experiment was carried out in Brazil's Paulista championship where two match referees - one in each half of the field - took charge of games, each with equal responsibility.

However, soccer's governing body FIFA decided against adopting it.

The latest experiment was first tried in selected UEFA under-19 tournaments last year.

In February, football's law-making body the International Football Association Board (IFAB) said the experiment could continue at professional level.

The additional assistant referees will be positioned on the opposite side of the goal to the nearest linesman but will not have flags.

They will generally remain behind the goal but may enter the penalty area to keep up with the action when play moves to the other end of the pitch.

In the Europa League, they will be from the same country as the three other officials.

Technical experts appointed by the IFAB will monitor the referees' performances to assess the new system and determine whether they enhance their control of the match.

Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson said during a recent coaching forum the extra officials would also help at counter attacks.

"With the speed of the players today, it's impossible for the referee to keep up," he said. "It's progress and progress is important."



Can only be good for the game I think. If it goes without a hitch, how long before it's implemented in the Prem?
 
Can only be good for the game I think. If it goes without a hitch, how long before it's implemented in the Prem?

Unfortunately its not an improvement, the biggest issue with current referee's is they have to be looking at exactly the right point at the right second to tell if somethings a foul or not, 2 more people might grab a couple more decisions but from single angles which, as we can see from replays, a ridiculous dangerous red card tackle from one angle, can appear like a dive and no contact was made from another. The other KEY problem being that, we barely have enough good ref's now anyway, and linesmen, another 2 linesmen for every game in the country at every level is a massive number of new ref's/linesmen, and we are sorely lacking in the quality of those officials already.

Its so easy and obvious that the best way is to give ref's the chance to see multiple angles for the biggest decisions. THe majority of the time small fouls, the odd offside and things don't actually change games, the big decisions so frequently do, infact theres rarely a game without at least one game changing incorrect decision.

Video replays will take away the human face of the game? What? UNless we replace the ref's with robots its still the ref who see's the replays and decides.

The thing of it is, the red flag American footie system is ingenius, 2 red flags, big decision throw a flat, 30 seconds of the incident from all angles for the ref alone, he makes his call, 99.9999% of the calls are correct when done like this. If you throw a flag just to waste time for a decision that was correct, you lose the flat, so flags are simply not ever misused to waste time or break up a play.

THe great thing is though, if we used that setup for 3 weeks, the whole 1 minute, maybe 2 per game that gets used up would almost disappear anyway. Diving would simply never get anything but a yellow card, yanking shirts on the blind side of the ref would be a penalty, because you would almost never ever get away with these fouls, they'd dissappear from the game as would almost all cheating.

Accidental fouls still happen, tough challenges happen, but flat out cheating, diving and things like stamps would be almost non existant in the game.
 
Better then using technology imo, while the human error remains, at least we get better views on things.
 
Sounds good to me.

It'll certainly rule out stupid mistakes like the Crystal Palace goal that never was a few weeks ago in the Championship.
 
"Things have not improved in refereeing for more than 100 years. I am against video technology because that will take the human face away from the game but this system will help the referee make the right decision," Platini said last month.

And this is why one man shouldn't be in charge of an organisation, it should be a panel consisting of people from each country taking part in European football competition. Him and Blatter at FIFA are control freaks who impose their own opinions when making decisions. While this could be considered a step in the right direction giving the referee additional help, it still does not rule out human error. If they are adding additional support to the field, they might as well include two more linesmen with 20/20 vision as I don't see how it's possible for some linesmen to keep up with the action, yet they stick their flag up in situations where the attacker is onside. And while I'm ranting, why not stick a huge tv screen in each stadium to show instant replays. :p
 
UEFA president Michel Platini and FIFA counterpart Sepp Blatter are firmly opposed to technology, with the exception of microphones and headsets used by match officials to communicate with each other.

"Things have not improved in refereeing for more than 100 years. I am against video technology because that will take the human face away from the game but this system will help the referee make the right decision," Platini said last month.

Backward people, it works in Rugby, it can work in Football. The sooner these two retire the better
 
I dont see whats the big problem with using video technology in games. People think it'll slow a game down, but I dont think it will at all. I think its better to get a big decision correct then letting it spill out on the pitch in frustration and anger and basically destroying the game on the field and creating animosity against the refs.
 
I dont see whats the big problem with using video technology in games. People think it'll slow a game down, but I dont think it will at all. I think its better to get a big decision correct then letting it spill out on the pitch in frustration and anger and basically destroying the game on the field and creating animosity against the refs.

Exactly. It's ironic considering they brought in a rule a few years back when a player receives treatment he has to leave the pitch and return in order for play to continue, I'm sure it was introduced to put players off faking injuries but all it does is waste time and break up play. They really are afraid of proper change for the good of the game.

Bringing more officials in and around the pitch doesn't address the real issues. They don't get to see an incident twice, they all see it in real time. The big decisions in games can be decided within seconds with technology, I don't see why Platini doesn't see this. He's scared of football losing it's human face, who the hell does he think will be watching the replays and informing the referee if they used technology, Johnny5!
 
The way I see it is there will be no point in players trying to cheat or arguing with the ref when they know once it goes the video ref they'll lose. So in the end a fairer system that's not as disruptive to the flow of game as some people are fearing.
 
Back
Top Bottom