Expanding IP range

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
8,016
Hi folks,

Multi-site network at work is starting to get full, and we're running out of IP addresses on some subnets! The bugbears of when the network was set up ~7 years ago, when there were only a handful of computers, and people didn't think that we'd have CT/MRI/Xray scanners attached to the network and sending diagnostic imaging all over the hospital! ;)


Basically, we have:

IP: 10.1.1.x - Mask: 255.255.255.0 - Site A
IP: 10.1.2.x - Mask: 255.255.255.0 - Site B
IP: 10.1.3.x - Mask: 255.255.255.0 - Site C
IP: 10.1.4.x - Mask: 255.255.255.0 - Site D

Each site is physically it's own seperate network, but with routers connecting them via leased line. Site A (10.1.1.x) is the "centre" of our network - each other site is connecting into Site A.

We're rapidly running out of IP addresses, and we have lots of equipment on static IPs at each site - of course the simplest would be to take everything to 10.1.x.x and 10.2.x.x etc with mask of 255.255.0.0 (to take us from 254 hosts to 65534, but changing these IP addresses/subnet masks isn't going to be an easy (or cheap!) task.

After having a quick look, we've come across what Microsoft calls a "superscope" for DHCP, if I understand correctly, it allows us to have multiple DHCP scopes of different subnets attached to the same physical network, allowing us to add additional subnets to the current ones, without having to re-address all our existing equipment. However, I'm not too sure whether this is right, and additionally, how all the equipment on one site would talk to each other.

Any help/advise would be greatly appreciated, it's been over 5 years since I did any network design/subnet calculations, and my head's gone into meltdown trying to regurgitate what I had previously learnt!! ;)


Cheers!

Garry
 
Thanks for the prompt reply.

We would, at the first stage, move all the DHCP'd client workstations onto the new subnet (as per your example 10.1.5.0/24) , but all the servers would remain on the old subnet (10.1.1.0/24) - would this mean that all traffic between the two /24 subnets on a single site would need to go via the router's interface?


Garry
 
Switches are currently HP ProCurve, mixture of 4104GL frames, 2450, 2650. Routers are Cisco, show version gives: IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-DS-M), Version 12.1(3a)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc)
 
Steve,

Thanks very much for your help/advice. I will pass the link to this thread on to my boss, and get his input on the situation now I have the knowledge you have provided!!

Our leased lines are X21, but we have had surveys done for RF links between the sites, replacing the BT leased lines - so the routers would likely be changed anyway for ones with ethernet links, rather than serial, to facilitate the new WAN equipment.

Budget, unsure - boss deals with money side of things!! Down-time would likely be a late-evening/weekend thing only, but we could do it.


Garry
 
Back
Top Bottom