F.E.A.R on ps3

Easy · 3 May 2007 at 18:57

Anyone care to give their opinions please? Better than Resistance (played and finished resistance). Cheers

KNiVES · 3 May 2007 at 19:00

I finally got to play it. While it is somewhat pleasing to play, I wouldn't say it's better than Resistance, due in no small part to the extremely strange interface lag.

NokkonWud · 3 May 2007 at 19:01

I didn't think either were great in single player, both are quite good in multiplayer though.
Personally I would say Resistance was better, but FEAR, despite not being awesome, isn't that bad.

I wouldn't want to be paying any more than £20 for it though.

KNiVES · 3 May 2007 at 19:04

The thing is, the PS3 version isn't that.... executed well. I noticed really choppy framerates where the 360 wouldn't have normally broke sweat; and there is a slight interface lag all over the game. It's very subtle but disorienting.

Joebob · 5 May 2007 at 08:23

Yeah, the PS3 version is supposed to be the worst of all platforms... don't to poor development if you ask me!

Margaret · 5 May 2007 at 16:16

I haven't played the 360 version but I did have a blast with the PS3 version on rental and it wasn't too good at all.

Agree with Joebob, poor port.

neocon · 5 May 2007 at 16:50

practically all 360/pc -> ps3 ports are turning out to be rubbish

Im not expecting either of

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas
and
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfigh

to be good ports

Margaret · 5 May 2007 at 17:04

neocon said:
practically all 360/pc -> ps3 ports are turning out to be rubbish

Im not expecting either of

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas
and
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfigh

to be good ports

Ubisoft don't do good ports

BloodWolf · 5 May 2007 at 17:04

From many reviews.. most say dont bother unless u aint played it on pc/360 etc, rent it first.

neocon · 5 May 2007 at 17:18

if you want to play great games youve got no choice but to buy a 360.
i dont much like MS
i dont like buying dodgy hardware either
but its all about the games