F@H - C2D E6600 v.s. E6800

[KE1HA]

Sombody asked me why I wanted an E6800 C2D, well this is a good reason. All three Cores were at stock speed at the time, same work unit number.

-- E6800-CORE-2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 10mn 19s - 756.52 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 17mn 23s - 448.98 ppd

-- E6600-CORE-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 37mn 47s - 206.57 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 37mn 47s - 206.57 ppd

-- E6600-CORE-2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 38mn 58s - 200.29 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 39mn 00s - 200.12 ppd
.

 

[KE1HA]

It's a Beta WU.

I thought the numbers were a bit strange as well, but if you look on my EOC stats today at 10.28, 9am I got 542 pts for one of them, so it seems to be working ok. Have two more of them on the E6600 at the moment.

E6800 Setup:
1x GPU Core
1x CPU Core

E6600
2x CPU Cores
.

 

[KE1HA]

NO WAY! Can that be right.

Different workunits, have to be... or something was using the E6600.


Same mem B/W unless different timings.

There is nowt different, apart form 530mhz...

I dont know Concorde, Im just reading what the FAH monitor is saying. Will do some investigating.
.