F@H - WU 1495

KE1HA

KE1HA

KE1HA

Associate
Joined
3 Jul 2004
Posts
866
Location
Helena, Montana
I got this one after the Server Download Problem earlier today. What do you make of this ?

F@H Monitor

-- E6800-CORE-1 -- Clocked @ 3.75GHZ

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 27s - 1519.30 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 27s - 1519.30 ppd


LOG FILE:

[05:12:34]
[05:12:34] *------------------------------*
[05:12:34] Folding@Home Gromacs Core
[05:12:34] Version 1.90 (March 8, 2006)
[05:12:34]
[05:12:34] Preparing to commence simulation
[05:12:34] - Assembly optimizations manually forced on.
[05:12:34] - Not checking prior termination.
[05:12:37] - Expanded 4063088 -> 20457864 (decompressed 503.5 percent)
[05:12:38] - Starting from initial work packet
[05:12:38]
[05:12:38] Project: 1495 (Run 2, Clone 52, Gen 39)
[05:12:38]
[05:12:38] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[05:12:38] Entering M.D.
[05:12:44] Protein: p1495_tet_new
[05:12:44]
[05:12:44] Writing local files
[05:12:47] Extra SSE boost OK.
[05:12:47] Writing local files
[05:12:47] Completed 0 out of 125000 steps (0)
[05:16:18] Writing local files
[05:16:18] Completed 1250 out of 125000 steps (1)
[05:19:49] Writing local files
[05:19:49] Completed 2500 out of 125000 steps (2)
[05:23:18] Writing local files
[05:23:18] Completed 3750 out of 125000 steps (3)
[05:26:48] Writing local files
[05:26:48] Completed 5000 out of 125000 steps (4)
[05:30:16] Writing local files
[05:30:16] Completed 6250 out of 125000 steps (5)
[05:33:43] Writing local files
[05:33:43] Completed 7500 out of 125000 steps (6)
[05:37:11] Writing local files
[05:37:11] Completed 8750 out of 125000 steps (7)
[05:40:38] Writing local files
[05:40:38] Completed 10000 out of 125000 steps (8)
[05:44:05] Writing local files
[05:44:05] Completed 11250 out of 125000 steps (9)
[05:47:32] Writing local files
[05:47:32] Completed 12500 out of 125000 steps (10)
[05:50:59] Writing local files
[05:50:59] Completed 13750 out of 125000 steps (11)
[05:54:26] Writing local files
[05:54:27] Completed 15000 out of 125000 steps (12)
[05:57:54] Writing local files
[05:57:54] Completed 16250 out of 125000 steps (13)
[06:01:21] Writing local files
[06:01:21] Completed 17500 out of 125000 steps (14)
[06:04:48] Writing local files
[06:04:49] Completed 18750 out of 125000 steps (15)
[06:08:16] Writing local files
[06:08:16] Completed 20000 out of 125000 steps (16)
[06:11:43] Writing local files
[06:11:43] Completed 21250 out of 125000 steps (17)
[06:15:10] Writing local files
[06:15:10] Completed 22500 out of 125000 steps (18)
[06:18:37] Writing local files
[06:18:37] Completed 23750 out of 125000 steps (19)
[06:22:04] Writing local files
[06:22:04] Completed 25000 out of 125000 steps (20)
[06:25:32] Writing local files
[06:25:32] Completed 26250 out of 125000 steps (21)
[06:28:59] Writing local files
[06:28:59] Completed 27500 out of 125000 steps (22)
[06:32:26] Writing local files
[06:32:26] Completed 28750 out of 125000 steps (23)
[06:35:53] Writing local files
[06:35:53] Completed 30000 out of 125000 steps (24)

Anyone else getting these sorts of numbers?
.
 
Last edited:
Wow 1500ppd :eek:

Code: 
I can only manage

Project : 1495
Core    : Gromacs
Frames  : 100
Credit  : 364


 -- e6600-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 42s - 1416.65 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 49s - 1373.34 ppd



 -- e6600-2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 45s - 1397.76 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 51s - 1361.45 ppd

I just wish I could get more of them :D

Dunc
 
Project : 1495
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364


-- C2D - Client 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 55s - 1338.28 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 4mn 45s - 1103.49 ppd


Grr, wish my C2D would clock more :(

Might buy another one when it gets to C revision, muhahahaha
 
Yeah, they were nice. I got a month straight of them on beta. That's probably why I'm so depressed about my PPD now.

Still, ~900 PPD from the GRO-SMP client on a lowly Core Duo 1.6 @ stock is nice.

I'm going to try and get the X1800 installed at the weekend as well, which will (hopefully) allow me to go GPU as well. I need an idiots guide to how to set it all up now. Billy? ;)
 
Project : 1495
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364


-- Brenda 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 4mn 56s - 1062.49 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 5mn 17s - 992.10 ppd

thats before I clocked the core2 on there.
 
My AVE's are up from the original WU. I've gotten another one on the 6800, it'a at 76% already .. I could do with a month of these As Ive been suffering BADLY with the rubbish 21XX wu's. Maybe Stanford felt sorry for me :p

-- E6800-CORE-1 -- Clocked @ 3.75GHZ

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 26s - 1526.68 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 26s - 1526.68 ppd
.
 
What is the PPD on these 1495s when two are running simultaneously on the C2D? Can you get anywhere near double the PPD, or does the shared cache get in the way?
 
Mattus said:
What is the PPD on these 1495s when two are running simultaneously on the C2D? Can you get anywhere near double the PPD, or does the shared cache get in the way?
Click to expand...

Yes it doubles on mine. There again I have not just run it on one core to see what it would do.

Dunc
 
Project : 1495
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364


-- Folding 1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 14mn 26s - 363.16 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 17mn 14s - 304.15 ppd

That's on a +4600 @ 2.4MHz :(

I can't keep up with you C2D guys & Lord Shadow is going to stomp me. I've almost taken root in cell88.
 
Even my stock e6600 is putting a hammering on this one. Need a new MB so I can clock it up:

-- E6600-CORE-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 5mn 29s - 955.91 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 5mn 31s - 950.14 ppd


I had a 1497 on my e6800 as well. I dont know if this was @ 3.75GHZ or not.:

-- E6800-CORE-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 20s - 1572.48 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 20s - 1572.48 ppd
.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom