F@H - WU 1498

KE1HA · 2 Dec 2006 at 03:28

Anyone eslse getting these puppies ?

-- E6800-CORE-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 18mn 08s - 430.41 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 18mn 08s - 430.41 ppd

These aren't bad either:

-- E6800-CORE-1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 22s - 461.14 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 11mn 22s - 461.14 ppd

Wish all my machines could get these !!
.

shadowscotland · 2 Dec 2006 at 08:55

if they are simular to

Project : 1495
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364

-- 805d 7 --

Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 40s - 449.28 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 10s - 398.10 ppd

or

Project : 1497
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364

-- 805d 3 --

Min. Time / Frame : 11mn 52s - 441.71 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 11mn 52s - 441.71 ppd

your E6800 is really under acheaving :eek:

If not result

Edit - just read the other thread, that said your running at stock - So I'm guessing that they are comparable - oc that chip my friend it should be double that output

rich99million · 2 Dec 2006 at 11:00

looks like I better get -advmethods back on all those machines

KE1HA · 2 Dec 2006 at 14:23

shadowscotland said:
if they are simular to
Edit - just read the other thread, that said your running at stock - So I'm guessing that they are comparable - oc that chip my friend it should be double that output

I brought it up to 3.5 .. Im currently running a new 1498 that was just downloaded will see what that does with times times.
.

Berserker · 2 Dec 2006 at 14:25

I've got one on my old Xeon (Prestonia type).

Nearly 2 hours/frame. :eek:

rich99million · 2 Dec 2006 at 17:34

Berserker said:
I've got one on my old Xeon (Prestonia type).

Nearly 2 hours/frame.

that does seem very slow - is that with HT? :confused:

I seem to have had some on my X2 probably when they were still in beta

Project : 1498
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 542

-- X2-Core0 --

Min. Time / Frame : 27mn 25s - 284.67 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 36mn 42s - 212.66 ppd

-- X2-Core1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 34mn 23s - 226.99 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 37mn 42s - 207.02 ppd

I think the 284 ppd is a FahMon glitch - about 210 ppd seems a lot more likely
edit: not sure what my clocks were set at back then though - I'll see if I can get one on a SocketA machine finishing in the next few hours

FreeStream · 2 Dec 2006 at 17:56

Project : 1495
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 364

-- C2D - Client 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 3mn 55s - 1338.28 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 3mn 55s - 1338.28 ppd

Uhuh

rich99million · 2 Dec 2006 at 18:12

p1495 is not the same as p1498 I'm afraid

With p1495s my X2 is getting near to double what it gets with a p1498
Conc I think you'd be lucky to top 700-800ppd with one of these