Far cry 4 system Requirments

Associate
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Posts
1,696
Location
Caithness , Wick
No way are ubisoft going to class the 290x in the catagory with a 680?

Leaked system Requirments

Minimum System Requirements
Operating system: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64bit versions only)
Processor: Intel Core i5-750 @ 2.6 GHz or AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2 GHz
Memory: 4GB
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 or AMD Radeon HD5850 (1GB VRAM)
Direct X: Version 11
Hard Drive: 30 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers

Recommended System Requirements
Operating system: Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8/8.1 (64bit versions only)
Processor: Intel Core i5-2400S @ 2.5 GHz or AMD FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz or better
Memory: 8GB
Video card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 or AMD Radeon R9 290X or better (2GB VRAM)
Direct X: Version 11
Hard Drive: 30 GB available space
Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible sound card with latest drivers

http://www.dsogaming.com/news/far-c...recommends-gtx-680-requires-30gb-of-free-hdd/

The sites not the most reputable but these leaks are spreading like wildfire now

Looks like they're nerfing the CPUs a fair bit as well as AMD GPUs

Even as an Intel/nvidia user , amd is stil my number 1 and this gutters me to see
 
2s8lhew.jpg

thought id get a snip of this just to lol at

is it me or are ubi allways on the backfoot

COD:AW uses 6GB.

uses or requires to start? I remember ghost receiveing a 4gb patch ?
 
Last edited:
Yet this is why in the console vs pc thread or whatever it was called… and this is why PC gaming is better? http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18633089

I used to love PC gaming. I truly did but there's so much screwing/messing about. Oh you need this, oh you need that. Oh they are looking into the bugs, no it's the graphics companies problem. Need to wait on new drivers two weeks after the game has been released. Now need another patch because neither/vaguely communicate with each other to sort it out. New patch breaks the driver or vice versa, rinse and repeat the merry-go-round. It's all right at our end. Blame each other. Silence and hide hoping it disappears.

Hello Crysis 2 and Battlefield 3 threads years ago here…

It's ok right, PC gaming is out of this world for console ports? PC owners die defending their highly priced Quad SLi setups for poor console bug ridden console ports that they're so proud of.

basing this on a company well known for its poor PC support is abit silly ... Nothing beats PC for anything when on a level playing field . This is not an even playing field with Ubi. Games that are generally broken for the PC are still in someway broken for consoles ... I seem to recall reading the loading bug affected consoles , people's save data corrupted and just as much fury from console guys.

As for SLI & Crossfire users ... We may usually be on the back foot in terms of waiting for profile releases and fixes but when is all said and done I'd rather wait 2 weeks or 2 months for a profile and play even a port with fadelity the outshines anything closed platforms have to offer.

Where poor performance in concerned it is nearly always down to the developer and not the drivers . ( obviously there can be driver issues but it really is few and far between ) watchdogs was proof enough
 
Back
Top Bottom