Farnborough 2010

Associate
Joined
20 Oct 2002
Posts
1,968
Location
Nottingham
The weather when the F/A-18F Super Hornet flew at RIAT was aweful and I ended up with nothing usable so I decided to go to Farnborough on the Friday to have another crack at it.

It also meant I could catch the BAE Systems Typhoon flying with it's weapons load.

A few more photos on my site... http://www.fast-air.co.uk/Farnborough-Air-Show-2010.php

US-Navy-F-18F-Super-Hornet-Farnborough-photo-1.jpg


US-Navy-F-18F-Super-Hornet-Farnborough-photo-2.jpg


US-Navy-F-18F-Super-Hornet-Farnborough-photo-3.jpg


BAE-Systems-Typhoon-ZJ700-IPA5-photo-2.jpg


BAE-Systems-Typhoon-ZJ700-IPA5-photo-1.jpg
 
Nice pics Gord!

I forget the typhoon was a capable bomber as well as a fighter!

Any idea what A to A stuff munitions it can carry as that some serious bombage going on with this one!
 
The Typhoon has a multirole load out. You've picked up on the Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs) but if you look carefully you can see the air to air stuff as well.....

BAE-Systems-Typhoon-ZJ700-IPA5-photo-1-arrow.jpg


Red arrows are 4 x AIM-120 AMRAAMs - Beyond Visual Range (BVR) air-to-air missiles.

Yellow arrows are 2 x AIM-132 ASRAAMs - short range heating seeking (IR) air-to-air missiles.
 
Crikey!

Thats a capable load out.

Are the fuel tanks removable?

Re the munitions on the fuselage - does the aircraft somehow jettison these before they fire?

Sorry for the questions - I used to be a plane geek and seeing missiles fire from rails.
 
Indeed! With that load out he can fight his way to the target, hit multiple ground targets, dump the now empty drop tanks and then fight his way out on internal fuel.

Yes, the fuel tanks are removable. It can have the two wing tanks, the centre tank, the two wing tanks and the centre tank or none at all fitted. They can alos be jettisoned at any time including whilst supersonic.

The A2A missiles are held on with a C style clamp. When they are fired the clamps release and it will fall away from the aircraft before the rocket motor fires and it rapidly reaches Mach 4.
 
Indeed! With that load out he can fight his way to the target, hit multiple ground targets, dump the now empty drop tanks and then fight his way out on internal fuel.

Yes, the fuel tanks are removable. It can have the two wing tanks, the centre tank, the two wing tanks and the centre tank or none at all fitted. They can alos be jettisoned at any time including whilst supersonic.

The A2A missiles are held on with a C style clamp. When they are fired the clamps release and it will fall away from the aircraft before the rocket motor fires and it rapidly reaches Mach 4.

Top information there~
Plus, I love number 2!
 
Loving your work Gord. Showed your website to a colleage of mine who love's his combat aircraft and he was in heaven. Recommended you goto Greece and get some shots of their planes :D
 
Some of my pics here: http://www.doufos.co.uk/lightroom/farn2010/

By no means anywhere near as nice as Gord's, but I think they are ok for the light conditions and a Canon 55-250IS

You've done well but next time you need to have a go at getting some rotor / prop blur. Give 1/250s a go.

Loving your work Gord. Showed your website to a colleage of mine who love's his combat aircraft and he was in heaven. Recommended you goto Greece and get some shots of their planes :D

:D Greece isn't high on my list of places to go with a camera and a radio scanner!

are you on flickr Gordon ?

No, flickr has never really appealed to me.
 
^^Gord^^; said:
You've done well but next time you need to have a go at getting some rotor / prop blur. Give 1/250s a go.



:D Greece isn't high on my list of places to go with a camera and a radio scanner!



No, flickr has never really appealed to me.

Maybe you should give it a go as it's another way of letting others see your excellent shots, I'm sure I'm not the only one that would like to see all your pictures plus it's helpful to others as they can look at the exif data for each picture and get an idea of what setting and lens you used to get such shots.
 
You've done well but next time you need to have a go at getting some rotor / prop blur. Give 1/250s a go.

Thanks :) As for the rotor blur I was trying. It was hard to balance with the poorer light, especially with the Chinook. The Rotor blur makes the photos really.
 
As ever, stunning Gordon!

Some of my pics here: http://www.doufos.co.uk/lightroom/farn2010/

By no means anywhere near as nice as Gord's, but I think they are ok for the light conditions and a Canon 55-250IS

What camera was the 55-250 attached to for these? This is the lens I use for my aviation work at the moment, I like your sets. Echoing the above with the shutter speed on the props. Sometimes difficult unless your practiced like Gordon as a prop plane's props are usually spinning faster than the ones on the chinook.

All about experimenting. Id be very proud of those though!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom