Hi guys,
I've installed Far Cry 2 on my system lately and my Vapor-X 4890 isn't coming close to any benches I've seen online. I'm using the latest drivers and had similar results with older ones bundled with the card.
Settings (Ultra High no AA) - Far Cry 2 Bench tool
Settings: Demo(Ranch Small), 1680x1050 (59Hz), D3D9, Fixed Time Step(No), Disable Artificial Intelligence(No), Full Screen, Anti-Aliasing(None), VSync(No), Overall Quality(Ultra High), Vegetation(Very High), Shading(Ultra High), Terrain(Ultra High), Geometry(Ultra High), Post FX(High), Texture(Ultra High), Shadow(Ultra High), Ambient(High), Hdr(Yes), Bloom(Yes), Fire(High), Physics(High), RealTrees(High)
Average FPS: 36.77
Whereas the review linked at the bottom gets a miniumum of 45.
The only way I get higher framerates is by setting everything to high (with geom. and shadows to medium) which gives about 60fps but looks pretty horrible and has bad pop-in. Also DX10 doesn't work as it becomes an utter slide show. What do you think guys?
Here's my system:
Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 4890 Vapor-X 1024MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card
Intel Core i5 750 2.66Ghz (Lynnfield) (Socket LGA1156) - OEM
Antec P183 Super Midi Tower Case - Gun Metal Black (No PSU)
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 Intel P55 (Socket 1156) DDR3 Motherboard
Be Quiet! Straight Power E7 550W Power Supply
OCZ Obsidian 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C9 Dual Channel (OCZ3OB1600LV4GK)
Zalman CNPS10X-Quiet CPU Cooler (754939940AM2AM2+AM377511561366)
Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM (WD5000AAKS)
Sony Optiarc AD-7240S 24x DVD±RW SATA ReWriter (Black) - OEM
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2009/04/03/radeon-hd-4890-vs-geforce-gtx-275/9
I've installed Far Cry 2 on my system lately and my Vapor-X 4890 isn't coming close to any benches I've seen online. I'm using the latest drivers and had similar results with older ones bundled with the card.
Settings (Ultra High no AA) - Far Cry 2 Bench tool
Settings: Demo(Ranch Small), 1680x1050 (59Hz), D3D9, Fixed Time Step(No), Disable Artificial Intelligence(No), Full Screen, Anti-Aliasing(None), VSync(No), Overall Quality(Ultra High), Vegetation(Very High), Shading(Ultra High), Terrain(Ultra High), Geometry(Ultra High), Post FX(High), Texture(Ultra High), Shadow(Ultra High), Ambient(High), Hdr(Yes), Bloom(Yes), Fire(High), Physics(High), RealTrees(High)
Average FPS: 36.77
Whereas the review linked at the bottom gets a miniumum of 45.
The only way I get higher framerates is by setting everything to high (with geom. and shadows to medium) which gives about 60fps but looks pretty horrible and has bad pop-in. Also DX10 doesn't work as it becomes an utter slide show. What do you think guys?
Here's my system:
Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 4890 Vapor-X 1024MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card
Intel Core i5 750 2.66Ghz (Lynnfield) (Socket LGA1156) - OEM
Antec P183 Super Midi Tower Case - Gun Metal Black (No PSU)
Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 Intel P55 (Socket 1156) DDR3 Motherboard
Be Quiet! Straight Power E7 550W Power Supply
OCZ Obsidian 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C9 Dual Channel (OCZ3OB1600LV4GK)
Zalman CNPS10X-Quiet CPU Cooler (754939940AM2AM2+AM377511561366)
Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA-II 16MB Cache - OEM (WD5000AAKS)
Sony Optiarc AD-7240S 24x DVD±RW SATA ReWriter (Black) - OEM
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2009/04/03/radeon-hd-4890-vs-geforce-gtx-275/9