FC2 Question

Garonazz · 19 Oct 2010 at 01:53

After doing some research, im curious about something.

What do you, community, think I should be getting out of this system FPS wise, from Far Cry 2, 1680x1050 Resolution, Optimal settings (Very High):

AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE 3.2ghz
GTX460 768mb (830|1670|1950|
4GB G.Skill DDR3 Ram

Thanks in advance

chaotic_uk · 19 Oct 2010 at 02:17

using what amount of AA ?

Garonazz · 19 Oct 2010 at 02:49

Either x2 or None.

chaotic_uk · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:03

anything from 60fps upto 100+ depending on the number of npc's etc

Garonazz · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:06

See, thats the problem I have.

I often lower to 50's and sometimes 40's aswell, just by looking at a oasis, for instance, and ive got no idea whats the problem.

Drivers updated, everything is fine. Ive been told the CPU isnt a bottleneck either.

chaotic_uk · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:10

try it on high to see what fps you get

Garonazz · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:20

About the same FPS. So it must mean it IS the cpu afterall ?

chaotic_uk · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:29

just noticed it's the 768mb version , perhaps somebody with a gtx 460 would be better at seeing what is normal fps with this gfx card and fc2

Garonazz · 19 Oct 2010 at 03:35

Its overclocked though, and it runs better than a 1GB Ver.

bigjimmyauk · 19 Oct 2010 at 04:16

i thought far cry 2 was quite a cpu dependant game i know best results come from i7 systems if you look at benchmarks

'Wes · 19 Oct 2010 at 09:34

It is but it's graphical detail is still pretty demanding, the slightest hiccup and you get micro-stuttering.

dave1983 · 19 Oct 2010 at 11:56

Man the CTD in this game made me cry, NPC's that didn't die, saving progress then it crashes and having to do the whole mission again, respawn guard points after 5 seconds. utter rubbish