Field? That's racist...

Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
24,231
Location
In the middle
I think, sometimes, these organisations do themselves no favours.
 
On a similar note, the BBC reported about an hour ago that 5 US sites have recently been renamed due to them being offensive.


The article tells you what the new names are but not what the old ones were. I don't find that a particularly useful article for those asking what the old sites were. Like how we use spoiler tags on this forum, the BBC sometimes puts a disclaimer near the top of the article warning that this may contain upsetting scenes / this may offend some people / this contains flash photography etc. The Beeb should have done that.

Years ago, the BBC ran a similar article where a place in Australia originally had the n-word in it and it got renamed, but it still said on there what the original name was so we know what the place was / where it was etc.
The placenames previosly had the word 'Squaw' in them which is apparently offensive to the local tribes.
 
Back
Top Bottom