• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Finally going 939 - 4000 or 3700?

Associate
Joined
4 Oct 2004
Posts
790
How cheap am I?

Just bought a second hand MSI Neo2Plat for £25 and I'm um'ming and ah'ing about weather to buy:

San D 3700+ for £62
San D 4000+ for £82

I know the 4000 runs at 2.4 so I guess that the 3700 runs at 2.2 but the MSI is known to be quite a high clocking board so am I likely to see worth while improvements in the overall overclock?

Trouble is, my way of thinking is that when manufacturing on a new process speed binning is essential and the differance between the fasterst and slowest chips is massive but on such a mature process the differences seem to be minimal. Is this the case or as I way off?

I know it's only £20 diference but times are tough and I probably shouldn't even be spending that.

Any thoughts?
 
Very refreshing to get the voice of reason mate. I was expecting "It's only a score mate - stay in this friday"

Ha, I would stay in this friday but it's my B'day and I have an evening with my mates, my GF and all her hot friends which I'm not gonna miss :D

And if I get the 3700 I could get a Freezer 64 pro too
 
young lad said:
3700+ clocked to 2.9ghz 1.475v get it

That's really tempting me & I'm not scared of putting a few volts through either. My Sempron runs on 1.6v with a Zalman cooler. 34degrees at the mo but hits 54 when loaded. My XP used to hit 62-63 !!!

So, do peeps reckon that they mostly clock the same?

Is it as I said and the difference between the best and worst chips smaller with a more mature manufacturing process?
 
Hmmm, if it's just 100mhz I may well go for the 3700. Neither are exactly cutting edge and it should still be a good upgrade.

Slightly off topic, as you can see from my sig I run a 256k Sempron at 2.6 and X850XTPE. Am I likely to get a fair improvement gaming wise going to a San D at 2.8? or am I GPU bound?
 
MeddlE said:
3700 isn't a dead cert for 2.8 or 2.9, though you should be able to hit at least 2.75

To be fair you're using a Scythe Ninja which although quiet isn't the best performing heatsink. How old is it? What sorta volts is that on?

DanF said:
Ya the 4000+ oem's are all sweet clockers from OCUK atm. Could well be FX57's rebadged. Mines at 2.95ghz at 1.375v.

Thats real good though. Isn't that actually below stock volts? Would be a bit of a improvement on my Sempron at 2.6 running a toasty 1.6v

young lad said:
3700+ clocked to 2.9ghz 1.475v get it

The difference is clearly the volts required to get it near 3Ghz. Is this a fairly new chip young lad?

As DataMonkey suggests, it's only a budget system and for 100MHz I could do with leaving the £20 in the bank.

Plus the 3700 has 50p if I buy it before Thursday in this weeks specials. Bargain tastic ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom