Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 2,657
Finally got my loop up & running this afternoon. Wondering if anybody would like to comment on whether these are decent results?
Rig is:
i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz
7970 @ 1185/ 1625
Watercooling equipment is:
XSPC Raystorm CPU block.
XSPC EX360 Radiator (3x Scythe GT's)
EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ
XSPC dual bay res with D5 pump.
Prior to switching to my custom loop I had a Noctua heatsink (can't remember model) with 2x Akaska Vipers cooling it (running at around 1000-1200rpm controlled via Aerocool fan controller) and an Accelero Xtreme cooling the 7970. I did a few wee benchmarks prior to disassembling it to give me a base line for comparison:
Short run with prime95 (half an hour or so) I got the following results using CPUID HWMonitor:
Core #0 max temp 83º
Core #1 max temp 84º
Core #2 max temp 80º
Core #3 max temp 81º
I then ran a benchmark loop on Heaven 3.0 with 7970 clocked at 1150Mhz core and 1600MHz on the memory using Trixx. I set voltage to 1212mV which is a bump of around 100mV from stock. I set Accelero to run at 100%
I got a max temperature of 69º on the core, but I also got the following results from GPU-Z of VRM1 101º and VRM2 77º. I think this is down to either the poor quality of the heatsinks provided by Arctic or the poor quality of the thermal paste supplied.
Anyway, once the loop was up & running I run the same tests again under very similar conditions. I had the 3 GT's set to run at 1000rpm using my new NZXT external fan controller (had to replace my dual bay fan controller due to pump/ reservoir).
Run of prime95 for same duration I got:
Core #0 max temp 61º
Core #1 max temp 58º
Core #2 max temp 59º
Core #3 max temp 55º
The GPU idles only around 2 or 3 degrees cooler than with the Accelero. Currently idling at 28º as opposed to around 31-32 with air.
Run of Heaven 3.0 benchmark at 1150/1600 and then 1185/1625 with no increase in voltage or temps to distinguish between either run:
Max core temp of 42º with the VRM's coming in at 45º and 40º respectively.
Quite pleased thus far and temps suggest a bit of headroom for squeezing a bit more from the 920 and 7970.
Thoughts on the initial results?
Rig is:
i7 920 @ 4.0Ghz
7970 @ 1185/ 1625
Watercooling equipment is:
XSPC Raystorm CPU block.
XSPC EX360 Radiator (3x Scythe GT's)
EK-FC7970 - Acetal CSQ
XSPC dual bay res with D5 pump.
Prior to switching to my custom loop I had a Noctua heatsink (can't remember model) with 2x Akaska Vipers cooling it (running at around 1000-1200rpm controlled via Aerocool fan controller) and an Accelero Xtreme cooling the 7970. I did a few wee benchmarks prior to disassembling it to give me a base line for comparison:
Short run with prime95 (half an hour or so) I got the following results using CPUID HWMonitor:
Core #0 max temp 83º
Core #1 max temp 84º
Core #2 max temp 80º
Core #3 max temp 81º
I then ran a benchmark loop on Heaven 3.0 with 7970 clocked at 1150Mhz core and 1600MHz on the memory using Trixx. I set voltage to 1212mV which is a bump of around 100mV from stock. I set Accelero to run at 100%
I got a max temperature of 69º on the core, but I also got the following results from GPU-Z of VRM1 101º and VRM2 77º. I think this is down to either the poor quality of the heatsinks provided by Arctic or the poor quality of the thermal paste supplied.
Anyway, once the loop was up & running I run the same tests again under very similar conditions. I had the 3 GT's set to run at 1000rpm using my new NZXT external fan controller (had to replace my dual bay fan controller due to pump/ reservoir).
Run of prime95 for same duration I got:
Core #0 max temp 61º
Core #1 max temp 58º
Core #2 max temp 59º
Core #3 max temp 55º
The GPU idles only around 2 or 3 degrees cooler than with the Accelero. Currently idling at 28º as opposed to around 31-32 with air.
Run of Heaven 3.0 benchmark at 1150/1600 and then 1185/1625 with no increase in voltage or temps to distinguish between either run:
Max core temp of 42º with the VRM's coming in at 45º and 40º respectively.
Quite pleased thus far and temps suggest a bit of headroom for squeezing a bit more from the 920 and 7970.
Thoughts on the initial results?
.






