First attempt at Seascape...

Soldato
Joined
8 Aug 2010
Posts
6,453
Location
Oxfordshire
Loved seeing the see today, haven't seen a coastline for about 13 years.
Two things I have realised:
1) I really need some ND Filters
2) Live view is a battery killer (had to stop shooting as ran out of battery)

RW2_7355-Edit.jpg


RW2_7400-Edit.jpg


RW2_7451-Edit.jpg


RW2_7544-Edit.jpg


RW2_7547-Edit.jpg


RW2_7566-Edit.jpg


RW2_7603-Edit-2.jpg
 
Portland Bill! :)

Yep, looked on google maps in the morning, came across PB, then decided to check it out. For the last shot, I managed to climb up the pit thing with all my camera gear. Took a few shot's, then battery ran out, Doh!

Below is where I took the shot from...

Great stuff Exception, love the processing as well.

For an ND I'd recommend a B&W ND110 10 stop. I've got one and its superb.

Cheers ManCuBuS, trouble is though, I need something that will fit on my 14-24.

Do you mean ND grads rather than just ND's?

Mainly need just ND's to be able to slow the shutter down. ND grads could be useful, but I can do that by taking a couple of exposures and doing it in post.

Nd filters? Why so you can produce long exposure shots of fluffy waves crashing on the shore ;)

I've grown to detest that, it's the new selective colouring :D


I can never get on with live view in anything like daylight, I prefer to just hyper focal focus and get sharpness that way. Dof master app on my phone uses less battery because like you I was amazed how quick live view eats a battery.

You maybe be right, but for now at least I think it looks kind of cool. Ultimately I'm just wanting to try new stuff.
I found Liveview was also nice to use them composing the shot, especially if the camera was really low.

Nice shots but with that amount of cloud in the sky I can't help thinking they would have been even better later in the day when the sun was setting (not always practical I know)

I wanted to, but where the sun was, it was just thick solid cloud which looked pretty boring.


last shot aside which seems to be a bit blue, they are some lovely shots right there

Thanks James, the last one is more blueish because theshot was taken later in the evening at blue hour.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, went back yesterday armed with more batteries, however got lost due to some Olympic diversions, by the time I got there it was pitch black, and I needed my phone to be able to see camera settings. It was a little scary being out there in almost complete darkness (apart from light house), however it was pretty fun, although as I couldn't see where I was walking, I didn't want to get within drowning distance.

Also does anyone know if 'long exposure' noise reduction does anything to the raw that I can't do in post? Seems these long exposures can get quite noisy, sometimes I found they were less noisy if I upped the ISO rather than leave the shutter open.

Below is what I managed to salvage from the evening before submitting to the cold (only wearing shorts and t-shirt)...

RW1_1344-Edit-Edit.jpg


RW1_1351-Edit-2.jpg


RW1_1356-Edit-Edit.jpg


RW1_1362-Edit-Edit-2.jpg


RW1_1385-Edit-Edit.jpg


RW1_1394-Edit.jpg


RW1_1397-Edit.jpg
 
Then this fad will stand the test of time. Unlike selective colouring etc.
HDR still looks good if it's done right and looks more natural. I think it's the over the top HDR processing that was the fad, which never looked good even when it was popular.

On a side note. I'm hardly going to stop enjoying taking such pictures just because they are popular at the moment. That doesn't make any sense.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom