• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

First Intel Kaby Lake benchmarks leaked!

Soldato
Joined
28 Sep 2014
Posts
3,580
Location
Scotland
Here are first Kaby Lake i7 7500U Sandra benchmarks I found from HWBattle.

http://www.hwbattle.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=20033

i7 7500U Kaby Lake benchmarks:

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_d...ab96a781e9d4e1c7bf82b096f396ab9bbdcef3cb&l=en

i7 6500U Sky Lake benchmarks:

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_d...aa97a680e8d5e0c6be83b294f194a999bfccf1c0&l=en

Look like Kaby Lake have a nice boost in performance compared to Sky Lake.

Possible i7 7700K Kaby Lake benchmarks?:

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_s...e1dceccaa29faf89f1ccfcdabfdae7d7f182bf87&l=en
 
Last edited:
Hmm, from those links:

6500U @2.5GHz maths score: 46.49 GOps
7500U @2.9GHz maths score: 55.39 GOps

2.5*1.16=2.9, therefore the 7500U is clocked 16% faster. If you increase the 6500U result by 16% you get 53.92 GOPs.

55.39 is 2.7% more than 53.92, therefore the actual increase in performance is more like 3%.

Interesting maths.

I noticed there are Kaby Lake m7-7Y75 benchmark:

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_d...94a998bed6ebdef880bd8fa9cca994a482f1ccf4&l=en

Sky Lake m7-6Y75 benchmark:

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_d...95a899bfd7eadff981bc8dabceab96a680f3ceff&l=en

m7-6Y75 @3.02GHz maths score: 22.57 GOPS
m7-7Y75 @1.61GHz maths score: 34.59 GOPS

Kaby Lake Core M is really very interesting one, it pushed 53% more GOPS at just 1.61GHz nearly half speed. :eek: If m7-7Y75 increased clock speed by 87% to 3.02GHz you get 64.68 GOPS. :eek:

The actual increase in Kaby Lake Core M performance is 86.99%! :eek:

Look like Kaby Lake is Zen killer.

Poor AMD. :eek:
 
There must be an explanation for that. Either the core count is wrong (4?), the speed is wrong, the score is wrong, or it's got AVX-512 (to explain a doubling of peak performance vs. AVX2). What else could do it?

I doubled checked it, all looked correct both used 4T. It don't used AVX-512 as I found out it only use for Xeon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaby_Lake
 
Back
Top Bottom