• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

First try on Q8200

Soldato
Joined
23 Nov 2007
Posts
5,089
Location
Lancashire, UK
Ok, I'm just dipping my toe into the pool since I'm getting my hands on a Q9550 tomorrow, and haven't really seriously meddled around in OC'ing before. I know the Q8200 is a poor clocker, but I thought I'd have a play on stock volts to see what I could do tonight, before aiming at 3.4/3.6Gig with the Q9550 tomorrow.

Naturally, some questions have appeared...

Q8200 is stock 2.33Ghz, with a 7.0 multiplier. Generally it's a rubbish clocker. I've upped my FSB to 370, locked my PCI-E at 100, and left NB/SB/Vcore at stock (I'm actually undervolting the CPU in Windows, it's down at 1.1v and appears happy - makes me suspect that my cheap and nasty P5QPL-VM EPU board is the source of my 370 wall, rather than the CPU).

So my Q8200 is sat at 2.6Gig now, and seems happy, although I haven't Primed it yet.

RAM was another story though...

I've got some Corsair TWINX 8500C2, and I've managed to get the following out of it:

1110Mhz at 6-5-5-18-44
or 888Mhz at 5-5-5-18-36

Now, at what point does speed become more important than timings? In other words, without launching into a series of benchmarks, which would be the better RAM config to have? Or is that not possible to tell without benching?

All comments/musing/wise words of advice appreciated.

Cheers.
 
In all the trawling I've done of the net that is the most succinct explanation I've seen, thanks for that. I might even try dropping the RAM speed a bit further to tighten up the timings then.
 
Back
Top Bottom