flash drives, and home storage

Associate
Joined
1 Sep 2008
Posts
554
I remember a few years ago when I was at uni, flash drives were all the rage, but then people kept leaving the drive plugged into the computer and walking away causing them to lose their work, they used to be notoriously reliable back then and would die suddenly for some reason.

My brother works for a pharmaceutical company, and he represents many different brands and his car is always full of these cheap 2GB flash drives that they give him to hand over to clients in the medical profession. It seems that companies have moves away from giving out branded station to give out branded computer equipment, mousepads, screenwipes and USB drives.

I've had too many incidences of flash drives getting corrupt and dying on me, I have a habit of never disconnceting drives the way I should, going to taskbbar and ejecting the drive. I have played around with transferring files using Windows homegroup straight from my desktop computer to laptop, without needing a USB

I read this article on pcmech recently here http://www.pcmech.com/article/death-of-the-thumb-drive/

Which raises some interesting questions, and provides some valid points, has anyone played around with "NAS" drives, are they as good as they claim to be?

With the homegroup file transfer it requires both my computers to be turned on and connected to the LAN, I think a Nas setup might be more useful for me as it will be always on, and perhaps at some later stage I could get a HTPC which will enables movies to be played from the NAS onto tv.
 
nas is nothing new, its jsut a hard drive caddy with a ethernet port (at the lowest level) and a full on file server (PC) at the higher levels.

USB keys are only useful for going between sites and random backups of files in case you get robbed (eg your laptop is stolen), and instead of CD's for giving data to people where email is too limited/slow. and you dont have access to ftp.

Homegroup is just a fancy name for a network with password sharing so you dont have to use your accounts on each pc, or have non passworded shares. Its been being used (as standard) in homes since around win 2k i guess?

If its only the odd file i would stick with a network. if its lots of files to many machines get a cheap NAS drive. If its large amounts of large size files then get a proper NAS, but then at the price points of those, you may as well just have it in a low powered pc anyway.
 
No, a homegroup is not the same as a workgroup. A homegroup is the latest one for Windows7 with (supposedly) makes joining each others computers with windows 7 easy with just a single password. It doesn't work on other OS. They use Workgroup (Similar but fundamentally different).

I started with a NAS. And outgrew it. I then tinkered with linux (I hate it) and finally settles on a Windows Home Server build. I have several USB keys, my main one is currently a bombproof 8gb corsair one.
 
I have a homegroup (over 3 win 7 machines) and I use workgroups, I havent really noticed any differences beyond the user friendliness tbh.
 
Back
Top Bottom