• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

#freekesha

Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
59,292
this is a bit nuts - the story being told is essentially Kesha was allegedly raped by her producer and evil Sony won't let her out of her contract and now an evil judge has put commercial considerations ahead of a rape victim being 'forced' to work with her abuser....

Taylor Swift has donated $250k to help poor Kesha, Adel has voiced support for her at the Brit awards, other lesser celebs have lent their voices too and legions of so called 'SJWs'

oeGH0UL.webp


K34ZWvF.webp


vKeFU4v.webp




How can a rape victim be forced to work with her abuser like this?

But wait - it turns out she's not forced to, Sony has recognised the issue and stated she can work with a different producer. As for the rape - unfortunately that is a bit of a he said/she said... though, under oath (back in 2011), she has stated that he didn't rape her. Now she's claiming he did - so she previously committed perjury when questioned about the alleged incident before and now wants a court to accept her story because this time she is really telling the truth?

The whole thing seems like a bit of a sham - she's contracted to make six albums, she's made two so far - Sony & 'DrLuke' have invested time and money in her, she was already in negotiations with 'DrLuke' allegedly and threatened this case... and now she's carried it out and sued him, attempted and failed to get a preliminary injunction to break her contract which the judge noted was heavily negotiated (as opposed to the stereotype of a naive young singer signing something they don't understand).

Given her previous statement under oath and her apparent contradiction now I'm not sure how great this case is - the skeptic in me thinks she knows she won't win the case and is playing for publicity here in the hope that the negative PR surrounding this (because, well, rape is a hot topic these days) will cause Sony to renegotiate and/or reach a settlement with her.

Interestingly her Lawyer is hardly a women's rights advocate he represented Chris Brown after he beat the **** out of Rihanna... and on twitter he made a false rape allegation that 'DrLuke' raped Lady Gaga... subsequently deleting the tweet after Gaga denied this. Doesn't sound like a very ethical guy...
 
I'm not sure 'white men' are in power at all in scenarios like this - it seems that any woman can make a rape allegation with absolutely no evidence to back it up and any form of dissent or opposing views will be met with cries of 'victim blaming'... the assumption being by default that the alleged rapist is guilty.
 
I don't give much of a **** about the specific case here - it is more the reaction to it and how it is being played out in the media and online that is rather interesting
 
It would hardly be the first time someone has said something on oath that they don't hold to be true in their heart though.

point is - with no evidence aside from her word against his she's already completely discredited herself... she's either made it up this time or she's committed perjury previously but now wants us to believe her because this time her account (which has some significant financial incentives attached) is genuinely true, please believe me this time when I testified under oath I was actually telling lies but I want to be believed this time because this time I am telling the truth, honest I'll swear to it...
 
... because she regrets signing a 6 album deal now that she thinks she's worth more after 2 albums, couldn't get out of it and so has played this card to try and force the record company into releasing her. Fairly obvious reason to lie really, money.

it also seems they had a big falling out - he'd told her to lose weight etc...

p7Nh2NC.webp


apparently it isn't so easy to market her when she's hit her late 20s and looks like that....
 
I don't doubt that the music industry is sleazy, tis possible he *did* rape her... but you really lose the option to do much about that when you've got no evidence and have already stated under oath that he didn't
 
apparently so...

give it a few years and she'll be 'the artist formerly known as kesha' or maybe just a funny squiggle/logo...
 
If you don't have an interest in such areas it's not too hard to imagine not hearing of someone.

I've heard the name but didn't know what she looked like nor about any of this. Can't actually think of a song she's done either.

who cares...

one poster was apparently so not interested that he posted twice in the thread to tell everyone he'd not heard of her - why bother posting in the thread in the first place?
 
It is dwindling, she's getting rather hagged now. I was going to bump this thread earlier when I saw it trending on facebook but promptly forgot about it.

SJWs have, predictably, gone mental over the decision.
 
Back
Top Bottom